• Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    If the DNC wanted to, it could pass ballot & electoral reform. It doesn’t, because FPTP/winner takes all benefits them doubly - either they lose and can fundraise off “red team bad” messaging, or they win power and get their turn at the levers of power.

    If you’re politically homeless on the right, anything even slightly to the right of median is preferential to ‘conserve’ the world you’re clutching to. Slowing or preventing change is your mantra politically, because you like the status quo today/previously

    If you’re politically homeless on the left, you’re bullied in liberal unity under big-tent centrism, even though it’ll never effectively serve your core interests like right wing unity would. There may be some overlap, but good luck with actual legislative movement on LGBTQ+, unionization, campaign finance reform, alternative policing, etc

    Under a different system we’d actually have coalitions and better representation on issues- especially topics with entrenched left-right collusion like foreign policy.

    • 31337@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The DNC could have passed ballot and electoral reform under Obama when they had good majorities in both the house an senate, but they will not be able to in the foreseeable future (because they likely will not have strong majorities in both chambers for a very long time). I do agree that they probably wouldn’t, even if they could, unless the party changes drastically.

      I do have (a tiny amount of) hope that “progressives” can gradually change the party. The Republican party has changed quite a bit over the last few decades; neocon under Bush, Tea Party under Obama, and now MAGA. So, it’s definitely possible to change a party.

      • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        DNC was sued over the Bernie Sanders 2016 politicial era. DNC is considered a corporation.

        Justice Democrats were the “progressives” elected to change the Democrates, if you follow how they vote and talking points changed over the years, the party changed them not the other way around.


        Sabby Sabs had the lawyers of the DNC Fraud Lawsuit.

        DNC Fraud Lawsuit Lawyers Speak Out! Why Marianne & RFK Jr. Can’t Win (Interview Clip) [55:31 | May 15 2023 | Sabby Sabs]

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yi4XKwdVSNo

        • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why Marianne & RFK Jr. Can’t Win

          Because the former still won’t apologize for saying diseases were all in your head during the AIDS epidemic, and the latter compared COVID safety measures with Nazi Germany? RFK Jr is a certified antivaxxer as well.

          Tell me, do these two need to earn votes as well, or does that only apply to Biden?

          • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The video is much more than these two, the lawyers themselves even explain why they don’t like or would vote for any of them.

            Any politician needs to earn the vote, and should be highly criticized instead of defended.

            Many of us ex-Bernie supporters learn that the hard way, even if we have to learn it multiple times over until we fully understand US politics.