• Wxnzxn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s pretty telling a platform like YouTube really only gets fully enjoyable with an adblocker, sponsorblock and this. I wish PeerTube had a lot of good creators, but last time I checked (years ago, admittedly) it was mostly conspiracy theorists and cryptobros.

      • Molecular0079@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        The problem with PeerTube is that there’s no built-in way for creators to get paid. If there are no ads or sponsors, then the only alternative is some kind of value for value system like what Podcasting 2.0 has. Until some kind of well integrated funding system gets built for PeerTube, creators really are not going to be incentivized to publish stuff on the platform.

        • Meldrik@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Best I can think of, would be implementing Librepay into PeerTube and make payments easy af.

        • lohrun@fediverse.boo
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          At this point I’m down with paying a monthly subscription to a creator for content. I’ve never signed up for any creator’s pattern or anything because how the system is currently set up. I know some creators switched to posting less frequently because their more frequent posting appeared to be hurting their view count due to YouTube’s algorithm. I am so willing to pay a creator directly for them to go back to making more frequent content (and content they actually enjoy and not stuff just for views)

          • lackthought@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            my only issue with this is eventually people will hit a financial limit and only be able to support a few creators, leaving others without funding

            I’m following over 30 youtube channels, even at $1/month per channel that would still be $30/month which is too much for me honestly. not to mention the fact I would have to manage 30 different subscriptions

            I’d like a youtube premium style subscription where I can specify a group of channels and the money gets distributed to them only

            this way my money isn’t going to conspiracy channels, and I would only have a single subscription to manage

          • Kilamaos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you are willing to pay… then why not yt premium ? A cut goes to google, sure, but it goes to creators, based on your watch time, without falling into having to support 1-infinite channels etc. Plus no ads without any tricks

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ooh! Thanks for the tip! Dumb question, Peertube federates, right? Where you can get a feed of all subscribed channels from lots of instances on one instance? With a quick poke around I’m not seeing username@instancsname so I’m slightly thrown off, but I’ve also only been on the fediverse for like a month

          • Meldrik@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            PeerTube is also part of ActiviyPub, so yes it federates.

            I know tilvids.com doesn’t federate directly with anyone, but you can subscribe to any channel on tilvids.com from any other PeerTube instance.

      • SSTF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Don’t forget the PocketTube extension, which allows you to sort subscriptions into self-made categories. Which is shockingly not a default feature.

      • 𝜏au@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        adblocker, sponsorblock and this

        I’d even add Unhook (hide Trending, Shorts, Merch, replace “Home Feed” with subscriptions etc.) and Age Restriction Bypass (avoid the need to verify your account with a credit card). I also use Clickbait Remover. It essentially does the same as DeArrow without the crowdsourcing, which is already good enough for me.

    • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean yes but also it’s not that hard. Google is not trying to give you a great experience, they’re trying to drive clicks to ads.

  • rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve used it for exactly three minutes and this is already amazing. I hope it gets integrated into ReVanced and Newpipe.

    • Kyogen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thanks, I didn’t know revanced was a thing. I only enjoyed old vanced for briefly in its last days. So good to hear theres still options like this around.

        • rtxn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Kind of. It’s a desktop web front-end to Youtube. I’m not sure whether it blocks in-stream ads (and I’m not turning off Ublock to find out), but it does basically reimplement the Youtube interface without many of its undesired elements.

        • Krompus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          More like Newpipe but it actually works (GURU MEDIATION) and has nice UI. I just found it yesterday on FDroid, I recommend it.

  • Acid@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Really good extension, I’ve added it to my browser.

    While some creators like Linus have said they dislike the clickbaity titles and thumbnails but they have to do it due to engagement that’s simply because the younger generations are the ones engaging with that content. As an older person I’d rather just have a to the point description of what I’m going to get.

    • Tanoh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is a reason clickbait images and titles are used, they work. If they didn’t work, no one would use them.

      • eskimofry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You must think marketing is made of infallible geniuses. Just because it exists doesn’t make it good.

        • scytale@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They didn’t say it was good, just that it’s what works; that’s why it’s everywhere.

        • Lumidaub@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nobody said “good”, but if it keeps existing, it works or at least isn’t harmful. Bit like evolution.

          • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Or there are people with an interest in keeping it that way.

            I don’t think there’s any big conspiracy about YouTube titles, but let’s not pretend thing like wealth inequality still exist because they’re not harmful.

            • Lumidaub@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              What “interest” would they have to keep it that way if it wasn’t working?

              Wealth inequality exists because it works for the people who have the power to control it. In a way, it’s not harmful ENOUGH to change evolutionarily.

              • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Are you serious? You literally answered your own question with the very next sentence.

                • Lumidaub@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  What? The original argument was “Just because it exists doesn’t make it good.”, implying that it (click-bait thumbnails) doesn’t necessarily work. To which I said that the fact that it exists means it works. To which you seemed to object by saying that there may be people who have an interest in it existing - like they want it to exist despite it actually not working. I’m confused about what it is you’re saying.

    • Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I might get it for the titles alone. The clickbaity thumbnails don’t really bother me, but I’d like to have a good title at least.

    • SSTF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t think it can be said to conclusively be an age issue. I assure you that many Boomers and older Xers love clickbait titles.

      It’s a more granular demographic than just age.

      • Acid@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe but I can only go with my own anecdotal experience and It tends to be the younger audience more attracted to them.

        Of course, I fully admit I may be completely wrong.

    • Raltoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Don’t forget that creators will release a video that you might want to watch later and then change the information.

      You’ll see a video you want to check tomorrow but not enough to add it to the “watch later”. But when you check your subscriptions the next day it’s been 12+ hours and they’ve changed the title and thumbnail to further game the algorithm.

  • QubaXR@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Love the idea, but just to be the devil’s advocate, I think it will just mask garbage videos. Currently, the clickbait thumbnails and titles are an indicator to blacklist a channel, without having to waste time watching it.

    • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unfortunately because of the way Youtube’s algorithm works, even high quality channels are buried if they don’t play the game.

    • ajay@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If you look at the DeArrow website and browser extension pages, I made sure to only use high quality channels as examples (Tom Scott, CGP Grey) to demonstrate how far reaching the sensationalism problem is.

      • LichbaneLB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        CGP Grey is personally painful to me. He used to be a no-nonsense education youtube legend, but in the last few years he’s just maximised clickability - even going thorugh his whole back catalogue and changing titles and thumbnails.

        For example, he made a great video about generative adversarial networks ~5 years ago but now its titled “How machines like ChatGPT learn” - despite coming out before GPT.

        • dack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Pretty much every successful YouTube channel edits titles. It’s just part of the algorithm game now. You will often see videos cycle through several different titles shortly after release.

    • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      This…if they want to make their thumbnail as pathetic as possible, let them. It’s much easier to spot the junk this way.

  • kratoz29@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This sounds like a nice addon, sadly most of my YT consumption is done from my Nvidia Shield TV with STN, so I still get those annoying thumbnails I think (I have them in my home screen and that’s where I watch them or add them to the list to watch later within the Shield menu).

  • donotthecat@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This feels like, IMHO, trying to put out a forest fire with a single bucket of water. Instead, we should have a platform that does not encourage making titles and thumbnails completely unrelated to the video’s content.

    • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why though…it only is going to make garbage crap videos look ok and you’ll be just consuming more trash.