Suffering and success.

  • quortez@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Hasbro being the worst, yet again

    BG3’s only sin is having to be tied to the worst owner in tabletop gaming. Thank god Larian is independent.

    • sheogorath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Larian pls make a new series based on the Pathfinder ruleset. I think the success of BG3 has helped the mainstream to get used to DnD ruleset. Although Pathfinder is more complex, I think they have the chops to make it more accessible to the masses.

        • godot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Pathfinder was to get around WotC dropping D&D 3.5. Paizo was started by veteran D&D writers to sell adventures, which they still do as adventure paths, rather than a system. When WotC updated to 4e, meaning no more print books that Paizo could reference in their adventures, Pathfinder was a way to print new 3.5e PHBs and Monster Manuals.

          Paizo didn’t initially change much in PF1e. There were a few balance tweaks. The books were better laid out than 3.5. The players did the math on things like combat maneuvers in advance. In practice the game played pretty much the same, my groups jumped over seamlessly.

          Having run and played both, I do think Pathfinder 2e is counterintuitively simpler in play than 5e D&D. 5e plays fluidly almost immediately, move and act. PF2e is pretty demanding for the first hour or three, the three action economy and Conditions ™ are an armful, and many players need to unlearn some D&D habits. Once a player has below average system mastery PF2e is as fluid as 5e. Beyond that PF2e shines. The rules scale better to complex scenarios, giving players more clear options of how they could act and giving the GM a better framework to figure out exactly what someone needs to roll. I also think it’s easier for players to go from average to good system mastery in Pathfinder, it’s mostly just learning how to optimize their character and learning more conditions and spells that work in the framework the player already understands.

          For new players in session 1 D&D is simpler, in session 5 Pathfinder pulls even or maybe ahead, and in session 50 Pathfinder still sort of works where D&D falls apart.

          PF2e character customization, though, is much more complicated, which some people like and others do not.

  • rigatti@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Hasbro continuing to make shit decisions on behalf of WotC, the only sector of the company keeping it afloat.

  • vexikron@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Please do not tell me that anyone is surprised that a triple A game studio laid off most of their employees as a reward for a job well done.

    Please. Please tell me everyone has figured out that nearly all large game dev companies are pure fucking evil.

    EDIT: Welp, thats what I get for making an ill informed post after 36 hours on the road before passing out in my motel, yep, I probably should have read the article.

    • Lemonparty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      About a week ago you decided to make your lemmy account. A better idea would’ve been to learn how to fucking read.

        • Lemonparty@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m proud to say I’ve spread the lemon party gospel on lemmy a few times, and the reactions are always worth it.

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    laying off 1,100 employees as a way to "modernize our organization and get even leaner

    Yeah because that’s what we want of the ones in charge of publishing, administering and providing support for some of the most played games in the world now and historically: leanness! The fewer people to take care of important things, the better! 🤦

    I know that he’s talking to investors rather than players, but come on! Also, there’s nothing “modern” about stupidly trying to increase profits via mass layoffs without expecting blowback and for quality to suffer. That’s some 1700s bullshit right there.

    • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Also, when your company is ailing (read: Not making more profit than last year, no matter what ocean of money your managers are swimming in), fire the good parts. That’ll fix it!