• magnetosphere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Issues like this make me wonder: what’s acceptable to joke about now that future generations will find shameful? Any suggestions, folks?

    • TotallyHuman@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Some people are starting to shift their opinions on it, but jokes about men being raped (especially in prison) are weirdly accepted.

    • tr0xy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You should be safe if you don’t make fun of others. It’s not necessary to ridicule a specific person or group to make a joke.

    • argarath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m going to hope it’s about wanting to kill ourselves all the time, because if it becomes taboo I hope it’s because we have actually managed to make life better and thus suicide rates drop, but I honestly don’t know if we will get any better tbh

      • Coasting0942@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        “There are no taboos against taking one’s life here,’ said the Night Haunter. ‘Many do. This is not a happy world. But it can be a better one. By killing yourself, you take the easy way out, you encourage others to do the same. You might think you add yourself to a statistic, but your self-murder is much more than that. Every suicide adds to the rot weakening your culture. Every life abandoned is a signal that change can never be effected. You throw your existence away, and in doing so lessen the value of humanity.”

        Proceeds to de-skin suicidal woman slowly.

        • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Heh, as someone who deals with suicidal ideation daily, our collective devaluation of humanity drives my disgust. While our planet burns, human civilizations embrace imminent extinction (and the irrelevance of all current culture) to preserve the current power hierarchy.

          Nothing we do today will matter including those efforts to reduce the effects of a looming cataclysm and population correction until we collectively achieve a high threshold that significantly reduces its effects. Nothing in this case includes both my choice to kill myself and my choice to live another day.

          This time doesn’t matter until a huge number of us decide to collectively make it matter.

      • magnetosphere@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s what I have a hard time with. Antivaxxers? Trump supporters? Callous billionaires? They all seem like fair game to me.

        • Neato@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          In the case of previous groups, it’s usually persecuted and marginalized groups. So I don’t think that fits.

          I’m already seeing terms like “stupid”, “dumb”, “crazy” and other terms to refer to conditions people didn’t choose, especially mental ones, being used less and frowned upon occasionally. So maybe “crazy/insane” if we actually recognize it wildly as an issue or treat it.

          Online? I’m seeing a lot more hate and memes against furries cropping up that I hope goes away. Not that that’s new, but I think it’s shifting towards them since it’s become unacceptable in most circles to denigrate sexual and gender identities.

          Otherwise I think the question is: Who is society denigrating that is both a marginalized group and not actively/actually harmful?

          • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The thing with stupid/crazy is inevitably a euphemism treadmill more than any meaningful shift. We still need to deal with people who make absolutely terrible decisions in ways that are both shockingly unexpected and predictably exploitable. Calling those people “wild” instead of the r-word won’t change that they dislocated their skeleton doing some obviously pointless stunt for momentary clout.

          • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Furries is a good one. There’s definitely a lot of hate. “My coworker’s daughter said they were talking about putting litter boxes in the classrooms!”

        • darkregn@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Think about the words you and other people use and what they actually mean. Are you using a word that refers to a certain group of people who are part of some marginalised group? “Gay” used to be a very common insult, particularly in South Park. What about “lame”, “dumb”, “tard”, etc.

        • vis4valentine@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Antivaxxers? Trump supporters? Callous billionaires?

          Science deniers and right wingers has never been on the right side of the history, so these you mentioned will be remembered as the idiots they are, and Billionaires will continue to exist but will be remembered but not in the Star Trek name dropping Elon Musk kind of way, but in the way we remember other idiotic and callous billionares from a century ago.

    • Troy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Going to throw this out there: self identification as a member of racial/ethnic/cultural group will become a hot button. Right now the left screams “cultural appropriation!” when this happens. But appropriating another gender is somehow okay. There’s a real mismatch here in logic, and at some point in the future this will flip. Like, currently it’s okay for me to say “I identify as a woman” but not “I identify as a black woman”. How does that even make sense?

      • wizzwizz4@fosstodon.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think that’s mostly an American thing: they think that their “racial” categories are the same thing as ethnicity, and since race is defined by racists (who believe that it’s an innate inherited trait), it’s constrained by them too.

        “I was born French, but now I consider myself Corsican.” is an uncommon but perfectly normal thing in Europe.

        American racism is just absurd, even by racism standards. That absurdity even influences American anti-racism.