• Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    If you want to go down that rabbit hole, I’d point out a few things: He was considered to lean democrat in the 90s when there was speculation he might run, and he has faced significant scorn from many established republicans as well. He’s hardly an example of a typical candidate no matter what else you think of him.

    • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      Sure. Does not change that there are significant differences in policies that affect people’s life dependingvon the party and as you say yourself even more in the personality of the president.

      • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Yea, they focus on things that affect you on a personal and emotional level, not things that affect their own bottom line or the continuing function of their control systems, so you’re too busy fighting the “other team,” worrying about issues which are inconsequential to them, to mount any real resistance to their plans. That’s deliberate by design.

        • Lmaydev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          The cons outlaw abortion. The Dems try to relieve student debt. They’re exactly the same.

          • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Again, the important point is that neither of those issues actually affect the continuing function of their control systems, such as monetary policy. You’re being trapped by your emotions so you can’t see the bigger picture. Those issues are deliberately selected because they fill people with fear and anger.

              • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Like how your wages are tied to how submissive you are to their other control systems, so that everyone who doesn’t sell out completely is just barely getting by, spending all their time and energy just trying to survive rather than being capable of building any sort of momentum which might represent real competition for them. That’s why wages have stagnated while actual productivity skyrockets.

        • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          People are concerned with topics affecting them and aren’t concerned with topics that don’t affect the, go figure.

          • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            The point is that those broader topics about the fundamental functions of society do actually affect everyone significantly, but they’re so all encompassing that it’s harder for people to wrap their heads around, especially when harassed about things which elicit an immediate and intense emotional reaction. Everyone imagines nefarious conspiracies where their enemies hide in the darkness plotting their demise, while the best way to hide things is to just make them as dry and boring as possible, such as the legal system and monetary policy, so people who are addicted to the sensational and salacious don’t even look at them in any detail.