• redcalcium@lemmy.institute
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s always been vulnerable, but dismissed because common criminals didn’t have access to required tools and the technical know-how to defeat common keyless entries. But things has changed and many entities start selling tools on the cheap to defeat keyless system such as flipper zero flashed with honda rf capture, etc.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      So, when are car corporations gonna be held liable for selling products that are designed to be left out in public but are super easy to break into with cheap as fuck hardware?

      • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        When the insurance companies decide to not insure those models and people stop buying them because they can’t get them insured.

        • piecat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          That’s not being held liable. That’s just the market forcing them to change. Fixing the problem going forward doesn’t fix the IB problems.

          Besides, the market for cars is still terrible, and cars are a necessity these days. I’m not optimistic that consumers can pressure meaningful change with their wallets. (Who can afford not having a car for 6 months, waiting for the perfect car?)

          • aidan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I wouldn’t say the market is that terrible for cars, if you insist on only buying domestic new cars yea, but the used and import markets are massive.