• Duchess@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can’t believe how much fucking merchandise there is for such a small show. Compare it to even something like futurama in terms of cultural impact and there’s so much more plastic shit made for Rick and Morty

    • Veltoss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Rick and morty is not a small show by almost any metric. Funko pops also became popular right around the same time and have a massive overlap in fans, so it makes sense. Futurama was not out at the same time for the most part but there is still about a dozen funko pops from it.

      Funko can just make tons of unique models really cheaply, and they know fans will buy them to collect like beanie babies, so of course they’ll keep churning out different versions of the same characters of one of the most popular nerd cartoons that their own fans love.

      • some_guy@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        it’s a small show by literally any metric.

        The Circle posted about triple the viewership numbers. would you consider the circle a big show?

        • Aiastarei@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah yes, do compare a reality show to a fiction cartoon. I’m sure Top Chef has such a greater impact culturally than Breaking Bad

    • alertsleeper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      doesn’t matter, these"judges" already convicted him. Forget due process. Getting accused publicly == being guilty forever on social media.

      • Nataratata@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s also important to remember that this is how most abuse cases work out. There is almost never enough evidence because it is almost impossible to proof beyond reasonable doubt. It’s incredibly rare that someone gets convicted in an abuse case, no matter if they actually committed abuse or not. The victim has to basically stand in court with the gunk and fingerprints of the perpetrator still on them and video material that shows it wasn’t self-defense from the other side, for any conviction to actually happen.

          • Nataratata@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That’s what you take from it? No, I think there should be no reports or articles or mentions on any cases that have not yet been decided upon by a court. A private’s persons life is not ruined by an accusation because it almost never leads to a conviction, regardless of whether they are guilty or not.

            • Aiastarei@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sorry, I thought you were saying in subtext that we should only judge based on accusations since evidence is hard to get for abuse cases. My bad!

              • Nataratata@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                No, I am really not that good in English. I often realise people understand it slightly different than what I meant. But I can’t do anything about it lol

    • rmuk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, but: a lot of other pretty unwholesome stuff came out about him during the process and his contract has a clause in it that allows him to be terminated on that basis; it’s actually pretty common for people in his kind of position to have contracts like that.

    • NickwithaC@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I want it to be satirical but then I remember that someone somewhere unironically believes there is something called a “manosphere”.

        • Maya@lemmy.fmhy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s everything from redpill misogynists to people who just support men’s rights and saying we should should direct resources to prevent male suicides is the exact same thing as saying women are property and deserve no rights or autonomy and there is no middle ground.

          It is important to understand what people are saying about this because when you hear someone say something that seems reasonable and correct but suddenly they show their extremist stance but then you dismiss that part because you don’t realize what they are saying.

          This is how all extremist groups get people on their side from Isis to Jordan Peterson to far right politics.