• Nurgle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    6 basically increases your lifespan by a 1/3. So if you would have normally lived to 75 you get to 100.

    • 𝜏au@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Sounds like it would make things like surgery with general anesthesia impossible though.

      Edit: Now that I think about it, wouldn’t 4 be better since it makes you functionally immortal? Dying from old age just means dying due to some of those health conditions (heart disease, cancer etc.) that get more and more likely the older you get. If you can’t get those, you don’t die of old age.

      • Nurgle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Felt like perfect health was just like you’re never sick, never get a cavity, yada yada as these are all kind of lowkey powers

        • Unanimous_anonymous@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah I agree that immortal probably isn’t accurate in my opinion. It depends on how liberal you interpret the term “healthy”. Is a stab wound bad health? Is decapitation bad health? I’d argue no, but there is a (weak imo) argument that it is.

          • oyenyaaow@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            A stab wound on good health heals better than a stab wound on bad health. Any injuries short of death is still better in a healthy body. I would not want a scratch on a diabetic body. And even if immortality is not on the table, severe chronic illness makes aging disgraceful.