• PrometheusG@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Everyone skipping 4 is either young, or never had to deal with health problems.

    • I assure all of you, that is the most OP of all the options.

    Never get sick, no cancer, no aches, no heart disease, no Alzheimer’s, etc…

  • lasagna@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Perfect health is a no brainer. Not just the longer life but also live free from all the problems that come with health issues.

    The second, not so much. Talent sounds good but can potentially make a very boring life. Telekinesis sounds good too but I think I’d still go with the time pause as that’s effectively a 50% life increase. Imagine a day where you can devote 12 hours to work and chores and another 12 to social and personal? You then have perfect health which means you can achieve peak performance in pretty much any sport.

    • EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      All fun and games untill it’s the year 200000023, all of humanity is long dead, earth has been destroyed and you’re trapped in the white star that once was our sun. Unable to die, unable to move, unable to even lose your mind.

      You are still in perfect health.

      • lasagna@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I didn’t interprete perfect health as immortality in this case. Just a long life until I died of a very old age.

  • treadful@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    3 and 4 by a mile, are you kidding? Everyone picking 2 doesn’t lay awake at night cringing at past memories.

    • Nurgle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      6 basically increases your lifespan by a 1/3. So if you would have normally lived to 75 you get to 100.

      • 𝜏au@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Sounds like it would make things like surgery with general anesthesia impossible though.

        Edit: Now that I think about it, wouldn’t 4 be better since it makes you functionally immortal? Dying from old age just means dying due to some of those health conditions (heart disease, cancer etc.) that get more and more likely the older you get. If you can’t get those, you don’t die of old age.

        • Nurgle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Felt like perfect health was just like you’re never sick, never get a cavity, yada yada as these are all kind of lowkey powers

          • Unanimous_anonymous@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah I agree that immortal probably isn’t accurate in my opinion. It depends on how liberal you interpret the term “healthy”. Is a stab wound bad health? Is decapitation bad health? I’d argue no, but there is a (weak imo) argument that it is.

            • oyenyaaow@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              A stab wound on good health heals better than a stab wound on bad health. Any injuries short of death is still better in a healthy body. I would not want a scratch on a diabetic body. And even if immortality is not on the table, severe chronic illness makes aging disgraceful.