As sci-fi show’s 60th anniversary nears, a collector pleads for BBC to offer amnesty to those with recordings discarded by corporation

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    So unless I missed something, I didn’t see any place where the BBC went after the collectors for illegal recording. This sounds like they’re scared of something that hasn’t happened and, at least in this case the BBC is very happy to have found a copy.

    • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      1 year ago

      The article states what they are worried about

      This would reassure British amateur collectors that their private archives will not be confiscated if they come forward and that they will be safe from prosecution for having stored stolen BBC property, something several fear.

      • asexualchangeling@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wonder how many episodes would miraculously show up if the BBC made a public statement that they wouldn’t hold it against them

      • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This sounds less like a recording of a broadcast and instead physical media that never was supposed to be removed from the BBC in the first place.

        • daetilus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Discarded TV film was secretly salvaged from bins and skips by staff and contractors who worked at the BBC between 1967 and 1978, when the corporation had a policy of throwing out old reels

          That’s more like dumpster diving. I wouldn’t exactly consider that theft

          • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That’s more like dumpster diving. I wouldn’t exactly consider that theft

            You’re not a corporate entity trying to maintain a stranglehold on an IP. I don’t think there’s any depth they are unwilling to plumb to protect and enhance their profits.

            P.S. Yes I know the BBC is publicly funded by the British people but it is also a corporate entity that makes money on its unique IPs just like any other… cough Disney cough

    • athos77@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      1 year ago

      While collectors are in no real danger, the infamous arrest of comedian Bob Monkhouse in 1978 has not been forgotten, Franklin suspects: “Monkhouse was a private collector and was accused of pirating videos. He even had some of his archive seized. Sadly people still believe they could have their films confiscated.”

      Even if I wasn’t arrested, I wouldn’t want any of my collection seized.

      • HipPriest@kbin.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean that was 1978 when the policy of junking was still active and the BBC were more actively dickish in their bureaucracy. These days because that policy has been so roundly condemned as being short sighted and destructive to their own legacy I doubt they’d be so bullish.

        Now I’d expect them to be more actively dickish in their attempt to get ‘marketable product’ or whatever the jargon is however. And if I was a collector I’d know that I was in a very grey area legally so I’d still be extremely cautious.

        I can’t say I’m completely sympathetic to the collectors either though, in that they know they’re sitting on something literally millions of people would love to see and they don’t want to share it just because it’s theirs.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          The article also says these tend to be people who lived it. You see that 1978 thing as an historical anomaly, but they lived it. These were people who were repeatedly threatened to lose their jobs and be arrested for salvaging such things