Hi, I love Obsidian. It’s part of my daily routine since a year or so, and I use it to store all my work and personal notes for the future. The main reason I use it is because of its note storage method. Instead of relying on a database, it utilizes plain text files written in Markdown, as most of you already know.

However, I have a strange feeling about it not being open source. The recent events with Reddit have only increased this discomfort. My notes are in plain Markdown, so I have the assurance that no one can forbid me from accessing them. I also take precautions by creating multiple backups, which provides additional security against virtual loss if I handle things correctly (which I do).

That being said, I would love to have alternatives like Joplin or LogSeq that adhere to the same philosophy of work as Obsidian.

Joplin is not suitable for me due to its reliance on database storage. I prefer to have total control over my notes. On the other hand, LogSeq is more focused on serving as a diary rather than a personal knowledge manager, and it does not use pure markdown, wich will be a problem in the future when (not if) I’ll need to migrate out of LogSeq.

  • posthumouspoet@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would prefer it to be open-source, but at least the data format (markdown) is ubiquitous and stored wherever I want it to be stored.

    • redsol2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is how I’ve been thinking of it too. If an equivalent open-source solution comes out, it’ll be really easy to switch to, but right now Obsidian is just unbeatable.

  • netwren@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honesty I think Obsidian as a product. They have done a pretty good job of keeping my data open and available in the Obsidian Vault.

    I pay them for Sync, so I consider it a service for them to maintain and upgrade the software. I would prefer the client be open source but it would hurt their ability to stay afloat and profitable to pay their employees.

    If they go under or start an “enshittification” I can just take my JSON and markdown and make my own client or use one of the hundreds of other markdown clients to get my information.

  • ghostblob@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I always thought it was open source since they have a repo in Github. I also really love Obsidian. It’s a really great app for any kind of notetaking, not to mention it uses markdown which can be read by any text editor. It also works really well with Syncthing, so my data is completely local. Well, if enshittification also happens to Obsidian, I’ll try to find other apps instead.

  • swnt@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There is a loooog thread on the official forum on open source for Obsidian app: https://forum.obsidian.md/t/open-sourcing-of-obsidian/1515

    IMO the best approach would be for them to make the promise, that they’ll open source the code if they become unprofitable or uninterested in further developing ObsidianMD and then leave. In that case, the community has a fully open source stack.

    I am aware, that Obsidian is closed source, I try to keep the number of non-compliant uses of markdown minimal. While I use quite many plugins, I am aware, that the plugins being open source removes the risk a bit.

  • sibloure@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use it because it stores my files in a versatile exportable format (markdown) and the app is well made. I have blocked all network access from Obsidian so I’m not worried about data harvesting. I sync my notes with syncthing, so the folder that contains my markdown files is synced across all my devices.