I feel like I’m talking over you. I didn’t say china is right or whatever. I said north east front doesn’t factor into current push against china and people like sankar don’t really have much to say beyond the western push. That is the gist.
I didn’t say bjp bad china good. I outlined what the admin under bjp is like towards north east.
I think my comment in about usa nuke and the follow up line was unlcear. I was just saying time has shifted since then and pak was the concentration rather than china leading into war on terror. I didn’t mean trade in 60s, I meant India doesn’t mind china allying with pak, cause they wanna trade. Not in 60s sorry. I meant currently.
Again my whole comment was to say India currently doesn’t need the war in 62 to push for war now. They just wanna push western word now at this point. If it comes to any confrontation they probably want to redefine borders and steamroll china. It won’t probably get to it. That is all I meant. But I’m sure they want to negotiate since 2020.
Sangh/RSS didn’t exist in 1962.
This is probably the most laughably untrue I have read. When do you think they started existing lol. Sorry but Indian fascism rose around 1920s along with other movements in europe like italian or german. Savarkar one of the pillars of the movements wrote his framework in 1923. That was very central and instrumental for hedgewar who founded rss 2 years after (savarkar published in '23) in 1925.
When I mentioned sangh in my comment I was talking how they conduct their affairs along north east. And how they want to shape it. Like caa or with manipur currently.
I only contextualized north east india and the current way its dealt by the administration in my comment. But I will reiterate. People like sankar want a war at behest of the west and as much a western war hawk would. And he doesn’t need the border issue to rattle it cause the radio free asia shit is good enough.
None of what I mentioned was ahistoric. I don’t blame everything on Bjp.
I’ve reiterated my points a bunch of times since my early comments in the thread. I don’t want to reiterate it more.
India has preferred trade and negotiations since rajeev. No matter postures it will keep coming back to that. Cause trade in billions is preferred as opposed to throwing it away. But they won’t cut trade cause they still dispute border, they will at behest of western interests. Larger industrial investment were dropped out of capitulation to western interests.
Sankar doesn’t need to make up, he only capitulates. West prefers a war with china, that is what factors than a border dispute which is at negotiations.
This and my other comments already repeat what I’ve said several times. I’ve been clear about what motivates policy. If that is unclear to you or not acceptable, its fine. You can either read what I said or skip it. I have said my piece.
I feel like I’m talking over you. I didn’t say china is right or whatever. I said north east front doesn’t factor into current push against china and people like sankar don’t really have much to say beyond the western push. That is the gist.
I didn’t say bjp bad china good. I outlined what the admin under bjp is like towards north east.
I think my comment in about usa nuke and the follow up line was unlcear. I was just saying time has shifted since then and pak was the concentration rather than china leading into war on terror. I didn’t mean trade in 60s, I meant India doesn’t mind china allying with pak, cause they wanna trade. Not in 60s sorry. I meant currently.
Again my whole comment was to say India currently doesn’t need the war in 62 to push for war now. They just wanna push western word now at this point. If it comes to any confrontation they probably want to redefine borders and steamroll china. It won’t probably get to it. That is all I meant. But I’m sure they want to negotiate since 2020.
This is probably the most laughably untrue I have read. When do you think they started existing lol. Sorry but Indian fascism rose around 1920s along with other movements in europe like italian or german. Savarkar one of the pillars of the movements wrote his framework in 1923. That was very central and instrumental for hedgewar who founded rss 2 years after (savarkar published in '23) in 1925.
When I mentioned sangh in my comment I was talking how they conduct their affairs along north east. And how they want to shape it. Like caa or with manipur currently.
I only contextualized north east india and the current way its dealt by the administration in my comment. But I will reiterate. People like sankar want a war at behest of the west and as much a western war hawk would. And he doesn’t need the border issue to rattle it cause the radio free asia shit is good enough.
None of what I mentioned was ahistoric. I don’t blame everything on Bjp.
Is there any evidence of this? How could a river that feeds a third of your population not factor into a conflict?
sure, he’s a clown, and if the border issue didn’t exist he might try to make one anyway.
കേരളമോ?
I’ve reiterated my points a bunch of times since my early comments in the thread. I don’t want to reiterate it more.
India has preferred trade and negotiations since rajeev. No matter postures it will keep coming back to that. Cause trade in billions is preferred as opposed to throwing it away. But they won’t cut trade cause they still dispute border, they will at behest of western interests. Larger industrial investment were dropped out of capitulation to western interests.
Sankar doesn’t need to make up, he only capitulates. West prefers a war with china, that is what factors than a border dispute which is at negotiations.
This and my other comments already repeat what I’ve said several times. I’ve been clear about what motivates policy. If that is unclear to you or not acceptable, its fine. You can either read what I said or skip it. I have said my piece.