• InvaderDJ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Imagine if she had mentored and sponsored a younger replacement in 2000 and then retired in 2010. Where would we be?

    Now that Skeletor has died with no one obvious to replace her, the Judiciary Committee will probably grind to a halt when it comes to confirming judges.

    • Rapidcreek@reddthat.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      She was a public servant that worked for a long time on your behalf.

      California’s governor will name a replacement for the remainder of her term.

      Democrats no longer have a clear majority in the Senate. This has all sorts of complications. I believe it will still take 60 votes to replace her in Judiciary which Republicans won’t give them. Probably the main reason she stuck around to begin with. Biden has to be careful with his nominees if he can get through any at all. Gawd help us if a SCOTUS member dies. The call for Menendez to step down will quiet a bit.

      • bobthecowboy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That last paragraph is all sorts of reasons why she should have retired 15 years ago (at 75!) When voters would have easily voted in her (possibly even hand picked!) protege.

        We’re now left a mess because someone with an ego didn’t retire when they could have. Wait this is starting to sound familiar. Thankfully the consequences aren’t likely to be as dire this time.

      • InvaderDJ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        She was a public servant that worked for a long time on your behalf.

        She worked a long time and was obviously better than the GOP, but staying on for so long was at best a lack of vision and at worse an egotistical decision that will bite us in the ass. All these geriatric ass politicians who don’t mentor, grow the bench with the next generation, and retire when it is time to are leading us to the situation. This is going to end up being RBG all over again.

        • BuckyVanBuren@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Blame the Senate Committe Seniority system.

          Seniority in the United States Senate is based on the length of time a senator serves on a committee. The majority party member with the most seniority on a committee usually serves as the chair.

          That is the only reason to keep sending these people back as old as they are. You send someone new, they have zero power.

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            No. The second-most senior one from the same party would become the most senior and take over. There’s no good reason for her staying on 15+ years too long.

            • BuckyVanBuren@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              That would be from a different state and then that state would lose the power of having a senior committee member.

              There is a reason Senator Robert Byrd was the longest-serving U.S. Senator. Serving three different tenures as chairman of the United States Senate Committee on Appropriations enabled Byrd to steer a great deal of federal money toward projects in West Virginia.

              • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                We’re talking about California here. If any state isn’t starved of power and dependant on federal money, it’s California.

                • BuckyVanBuren@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Feinstein was on the following committees. You don’t think she pushed California’s interests in every one.

                  • Committee on Appropriation

                  • Subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies

                  • Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies

                  • Subcommittee on Defense

                  • Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development (Chairman)

                  • Subcommittee on Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies

                  • Subcommittee on Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies

                  • Committee on Rules and Administration

                  • Committee on the Judiciary

                  • Subcommittee on Criminal Justice and Counterterrorism

                  • Subcommittee on Federal Courts, Oversight, Agency Action, and Federal Rights

                  • Subcommittee on Human Rights and the Law

                  • Subcommittee on the Constitution (Chairman)

                  • Select Committee on Intelligence

                  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Thats WAY too many committees for any one politician, let alone one clearly circling the drain!

                    To answer your question though, no she wasn’t. She was literally unable to do the job and they’d known for years.