• Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    110
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    7 months ago

    While we are at it, let’s all (as in the entire planet) switch to 24hour UTC and the YYYY.MM.DD date format.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Some ISO8601 formats are good, but some are unreadable (like 20240607T054831Z for date and time).

        • zqwzzle@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          The ones without separators tend to be for server/client exchange though.

          • dan@upvote.au
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            I agree but they’re hard to read at a glance when debugging and there’s lots of them :)

            Having said that, a lot of client-server communications use Unix timestamps though, which are even harder to read at a glance.

            • zqwzzle@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              At least it’s human readable and not protobuf 😬 * though the transport channel doesn’t really matter it could be formatted this way anyhow.

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        That one feels kinda meh to me. It solves a handful of non-issues with our current calendar (I don’t care that the month starts on the same day, nor do I care that each day of the year is always the same day of the week). Each months having the same number of days is an improvement. It persists the problem that you still can’t use months or years as a real mathematical unit of measure and extends it to weeks, which is the biggest annoyance with calendars, although it reduces how often that becomes significant. Adding two days that have neither a day of the week nor month would mean significant changes to every computer system that needs to deal with dates, and is just hateful.

        The 1st of a month to the 1st of the next will always be one month, but it depends on the month and year how many days that is. So a month as a duration will span either 28 or 29 days. A week is now sometimes 8 days, and a year might still have 365 or 366 days, depending on the year.
        How do you even write the date for the days that don’t fit? Like, a form with a box for the date needs to be able to handle Y-M-D formatting but also Y-YearDay. Probably people would just say 06-29 and 12-29, or 07-00 and 01-00, although if year day is the last day of the year it kinda gets weird to say the last day of the year is the zeroth day of the first month of the next year.

        There’s just a lot of momentum behind a 12 month year with every day being part of a month and week. Like, more than 6000 years. You start to run into weird issues where people’s religion dictates that every seventh days is special which we’ve currently built into our calendar.

        Without actually solving significant issues, it’s just change for changes sake.

        • cmhe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Well, this is shitpost. And I wasn’t serious about this. I responded to someone that wants the whole world to switch to a global time, and since mankind existed we used some local time in our daily lives.

          Also UTC is not perfect because of leap seconds. Which means you cannot calculate with a simple formula how many seconds are between two time stamps, you need a leap seconds table for that. And leap seconds are only announced under 6 months into the future. So everything farther away, you cannot say how much time is between two stamps.

          So with UTC a minute can have more or less seconds that 60.

      • kn33@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Since we’re breaking everything, I want to use dozenal with the Pitman symbols and “deck/el” pronunciations.

      • amelore@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Move New Years back to march 1st, then the Latin roots will be accurate again.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      YYYY.MM.DD and 24 hour for sure.

      Everyone using UTC? Nah. Creates more problems than it solves (which are already solved, because you can just lookup what time it is elsewhere, and use calendars to automatically convert, etc.).

      I for one do not want to do mental gymnastics /calculation just to know what solar time it is somewhere else. And if you just look up what solar time it is somewhere, we’ve already arrived back at what we’re already doing.

      Much easier just looking up what time (solar) time it is in a timezone. No need to re-learn what time means when you arrive somewhere on holiday, no need for movies to spell out exactly where they are in the world whenever they speak about time just so you know what it means. (Seriously, imagine how dumb it would be watching international films and they say: “meet you at 14 o’clock”, and you have no idea what solar time that is, unless they literally tell you their timezone.)

      Further, a lot more business than currently would have to start splitting their days not at 00:00 (I’m aware places like nightclubs do this already).

      Getting rid of timezones makes no sense, and I do not understand why people on the internet keep suggesting it like it’s a good idea.

      • Loki@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m pretty sure they don’t mean “give up on time zones” but “express your timezone in UTC”. For example, central Europe is UTC+1. Makes almost no difference in everyday life, only when you tell someone in another zone your time. The idea is to have one common reference point and do the calculation immediately when someone gives you their UTC zone. For example, if you use pacific time and tell me that, it means nothing to me, but if you say “UTC-8” I know exactly what time it is for you.

        • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          Oh right, yeah. We do this at my company which has operations world-wide. If we say timezone we say UTC±. Apologies for the misunderstanding

      • Everett@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        You mean base-10? My totally unrealistic pipe dream would be to have the world switch to base-12.

        • pumpkinseedoil@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          I mean something like 1 day = 10 hours = 1 000 minutes = 100 000 seconds (currently 86 400 seconds so a second would only get slightly faster).

          • bitwaba@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decimal_time

            This term is often used specifically to refer to the French Republican calendar time system used in France from 1794 to 1800, during the French Revolution, which divided the day into 10 decimal hours, each decimal hour into 100 decimal minutes and each decimal minute into 100 decimal seconds

              • bitwaba@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Yeah. I think if someone had a sensible method for how we could switch from one to the other with minimal impact, it might work.

                What would very difficult for me would be the recalibration of my internal clock. Knowing a second is slightly shorter, and a minute is longer, and an hour is much longer, would be hell for a while.

                Unfortunately I think something that’s pretty hard coded into the society at this point is that a day should be able to divide by so we end up with the 8hr work, 8 hr rest, 8 hr sleep. I’d be interested in a 30hr day over a 10 hr day. But that one doesn’t make much sense either since it misses the mark on bringing tim fully into the 10 base metric system, but still has all the same troubles you’d encounter for getting people to switch.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      That’s good for file/record sorting, so let’s just use it for that

      For day to day, DD.MM.YY is much more practical.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        For day to day, DD.MM.YY is much more practical.

        It’s not though… It’s ambiguous as to if the day or month is first. With the year first, there’s no ambiguity.

        If you want to use d-m-y then at least use month names (eg. 7-June-2024).

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s ambiguous as to if the day or month is first.

          Not if everyone is using it, as they should.

          Besides, so is is yours. 2024.06.07 could be the 7th of June or (if you’re an American and thus used to the months and days being in an illogical order) 6th of July.

          As for writing out the month names, that’s no longer shorthand. That’s just taking more time and space than necessary.

          • goldfndr@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Au contraire! With a three character month, period separation isn’t needed, and the date is shorter. (Admittedly there’s likely to be a language translation issue, depending on audience.)

      • bitwaba@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Hard disagree.

        Least specific -> most specific is generally better in spoken language as the first part spoken is the part the listener begins interpreting.

        Like if I ask if you’re free on “the 15th of March” vs “March 15”, the first example is slightly jarring for your brain to interpret because at first it hears “15th” and starts processing all the 15ths it’s aware of, then “March” to finally clarify which month the 15th is referencing.

        The only thing practical about DD.MM.YY is that it is easier for the speaker because they can drop the implied information, or continue to add it as they develop the sentence.

        “Are you free on the 15th” [oh shit, that’s probably confusing, I meant a few months from now] “of July” [oh shit, I actually mean next summer not this one] “next year (or 2025)”.

        So the format is really a question of who is more important in spoken language: the speaker or the listener? And I firmly believe the listener is more important, because the entire point of communication is to take the idea you’ve formulated into your head, and accurately describe that idea in a way that recreates that same idea in the listener’s head. Making it easier for the speaker to make a sentence is pointless if the sentence itself is confusing to the listener. That’s literally a failure to communicate.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          You’re confusing your own familiarity and experience with a general human rule.

          My mother tongue (Portuguese) has the same order when saying numbers as English (i.e. twenty seven) and indeed when I learned Dutch it was jarring that their number order is the reverse (i.e. seven and twenty) until I got used to it, by which point it stopped being jarring.

          The brain doesn’t really care beyond “this is not how I’m used to parse numbers” and once you get used to do it that way, it works just as well.

          As for dates, people using year first is jarring to me, because I grew up hearing day first then month, then year. There is only one advantage for year first, which is very specifically when in text form, sorting by text dates written in year-month-day by alphabetical order will correctly sort by date, which is nice if you’re a programmer (and the reason why when I need to have a date as part of a filename I’ll user year first). Meanwhile the advantage of day first is that often you don’t need to say the rest since if you don’t it’s implied as the present one (i.e. if I tell you now “let’s have that meeting on the 10th” June and 2024 are implied) so you can convey the same infomation with less words (however in written form meant to preserve the date for future reference you have to write the whole thing anyway)

          Personally I recognize that it’s mainly familiarity that makes me favour one format over the other and logically I don’t think one way is overall better than the other one as the advantages of each are situational.

          • bitwaba@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Meanwhile the advantage of day first is that often you don’t need to say the rest since if you don’t it’s implied as the present one (i.e. if I tell you now “let’s have that meeting on the 10th” June and 2024 are implied) so you can convey the same infomation with less words (however in written form meant to preserve the date for future reference you have to write the whole thing anyway)

            That advantage is not exclusive to the date-first system. You can still leave out implied information with month-first as well.

            Personally I recognize that it’s mainly familiarity that makes me favour one format over the other and logically I don’t think one way is overall better than the other one as the advantages of each are situational.

            This is the biggest part of it. No one wants to change what they know. I’m from the US and moved to the UK, and interact with continental Europeans on a daily basis. I’ve seen and used both systems day to day. But when I approach this question, my answer isn’t “this one is better because that’s the one I like or I’m most comfortable with”, my answer is “if no one knew any system right now, and we all had to choose between one of the two options, which one is the more sensible option?”

            dd-mm-yyyy has no benefit over yyyy-mm-dd, while yyyy-mm-dd does have benefits over dd-mm-yyyy. The choice is easy.

            • Aceticon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              The minimal or non-existent benefits for most people in most situation of yyyy-mm-dd (no, the brain doesn’t need the highest dimensional scale value to come first: that’s just your own habit because of how numbers are spoken in the English language and possibly because the kind of situation where you use dates involves many things which are further than a year forwards or backwards in time, which for most people is unusual) - people sorting dates by alphabetical order in computer systems (which is where yyyy-mm-yy is the only one that works well) is just the product of either programmer laziness or people misusing text fields for dates - so don’t add to enough to justify the “jarring” for other people due to changing from the date format they’re used to, not the mention the costs in anything from having to change existing computer systems to having to redesign and print new paper forms with fill-in data fields with a different order.

              In a similar logic, the benefits of dd-mm-yyyy are mainly the ease of shortenning it in spoken language (i.e. just the day, or just the day and month) and depend on knowing the month and year of when a shortenned date was used (which usually doesn’t work well for anything but immediate transfer of information as the month and day would still need to be store somewhere if they’re not coming from “present date”) so they too do not justify the “jarring” for other people due to changing from the date format they’re used to.

              Frankly even in an imaginary situation were we would be starting from scratch and had to pick one, I don’t know which one would be better since they both have flawed advantages - year first only really being advantageous for allowing misusing of text data fields or programmer laziness in computer systems whilst day first only being advantageous in immediate transfer of date information where it gives the possibility of using a shortenned date, something which is but a tiny gain in terms of time or, if in a computers system or written form, storage space.

              It’s really not a hill worth dying on and I only answered your point because you seemed to be confusing how comfortable it felt for you to use one or the other - a comfort which derives from familiarization - with there being some kind of general cognitive advantage for using any order (which, in my experience, there is not).

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          if I ask if you’re free on “the 15th of March” vs “March 15”, the first example is slightly jarring for your brain to interpret

          Sounds like you’re just used to it being said the opposite (read: wrong) way. If you told someone in my country March 15th, it would be just as jarring to the listener.

          at first it hears “15th” and starts processing all the 15ths it’s aware of, then “March” to finally clarify which month the 15th is referencing.

          not in daily use. When you ask someone “what day is it today?”, they usually have a handle on what month it is and just need the day. For making plans, it’s only if you make them way in advance that you need the month first, which would be sorting and scheduling, not daily use.

          • bitwaba@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            When you ask someone “what day is it today?”, they usually have a handle on what month it is and just need the day.

            You’re still allowed to exclude implied information, no matter which method of dating you want to go with. You can just say “the 15th”.

            For making plans, it’s only if you make them way in advance that you need the month first, which would be sorting and scheduling, not daily use.

            I can’t speak for you, but for me I am making plans, sorting, and scheduling every single day.

            • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              I can’t speak for you, but for me I am making plans, sorting, and scheduling every single day

              Sounds exhausting tbh, I’m sorry…

  • HootinNHollerin@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    As a mechanical design engineer in America having dual systems creates unnecessary complexity and frustration and cost for me all day, every day. I full force embrace switching to metric

    • kreekybonez@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      as a mechanic working in a hodgepodge US/EU factory line, I have to suffer through always carrying double the tools to service metric and SAE machines. and after so many years in the industry, I still slip up and say 3/16 when I mean 3/8 sometimes, because fractions are a shit system for wrenches.

      oh, and some of our linear encoders readout decimal-feet, because fuck it, why not?

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      My condolences. I’m already annoyed with the times USC units are presented in Australia (our nominal pipe sizes are often talked about in inches, and sometimes valves and such have USC flow coefficients because the manufacturer is American).

      So I cannot imagine the pain you must be subjected to.

      • Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        There are three sizing standards used in the UK right now: metric for newer homes, imperial for older homes and farmer’s sizing for fuck you, that’s why.

        • letsgo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          We even like combining them in one thing. Tyres are measured using inches for one dimension and millimetres for the other two.

  • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Metric yes please. Also for fucks sake use the 24 hour clock. Some of us learned it from the military but it’s just earth time and way easier than adding letters to a number

    • ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      the 24 hour clock

      I switched to it in my later teens when I realised how many cases it would be better in.
      Conversion during conversation might be an extra step, but I’ll be pushing for the next generation to have this by default.

      Also, much better when using for file names.

      Also, YYYY-MM-DD. There’s a reason why it is the ISO

      Anti Commercial-AI license

      • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        The conversion is pretty much the only hurdle I ever hear about, but that’s easy enough. How many songs/films talk about “if I could rewind the last 12+12 hours”…it’s just a matter of making it fit in context people can understand when they know a day is 24 but are used to 12.

        ISO and while we’re at it, the NATO phonetic alphabet for English speakers. “A as in apple B as in boy” means fuck all when you’re grasping for any word that starts with that letter, and if English isn’t your first language fuckin forget about it.

        • ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          ISO and while we’re at it, the NATO phonetic alphabet for English speakers. “A as in apple B as in boy” means fuck all when you’re grasping for any word that starts with that letter, and if English isn’t your first language fuckin forget about it.

          err… didn’t get what you’re trying to say

            • PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocksB
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

              wrong.

              Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

              I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.

            • ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              I’m pretty sure that’s an example of why you should use the chosen ones instead of going “mancy/nancy” all over the place.

              Also, didn’t they just make a standard for themselves and other just took it because it was probably easier than making one for their own language (oh right, NATO… but let’s be honest here, NATO is just a forum for America to flaunt its power while PR-ing peaceful, so it makes sense they use English, which is also easier to be a second language than most other ones).
              Though I feel like China might have made their own.

              Anti Commercial-AI license

          • ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            The radio words were chosen to be distinct, such that for people who trained in them, it would be easier to distinguish letters being spoken over low quality radio.

            Not very relevant in the era of 2G HD audio, and now VoLTE.
            But when there’s a bad signal and you have to tell someone a callsign, it makes sense.


            I like ISO, because in whatever cases I have interacted with it, it has made programming easier for me.

            I like YYYY-MM-DD, because when files lose their metadata, if they are named using this, I can still sort by name and get results by date.

            Anti Commercial-AI license

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Conversion during conversation might be an extra step

        Conversion is always extra step, but you don’t need it if you use same timezone as other participant.

        Also, YYYY-MM-DD. There’s a reason why it is the ISO

        Big-endian is big. Alternatively DD.MM.YYYY or DD.MM.YY for little-endian lovers.

          • uis@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            It’s more along the lines of most signigicant bit/least significant bit, rather then byte order.

            • linja@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Right, and the most significant bit of the whole date is the first Y in YYYY, which we can’t put at the end unless we reverse the year itself. So we can either have pure big-endian, or PDP-endian. I know which one I’m picking.

              Your literal statement is also just wrong. The solitary implication of endianness is byte ordering, because individual bits in a byte have no ordering in memory. Every single one has the exact same address; they have significance order, but that’s entirely orthogonal to memory. Hex readouts order nybbles on the same axis as memory so as not to require 256 visually distinct digits and because they only have two axes; that’s a visual artefact, and reflects nothing about the state of memory itself. ISO 8601 on the other hand is a visual representation, so digit and field ordering are in fact the same axis.

              • uis@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Every single one has the exact same address; they have significance order, but that’s entirely orthogonal to memory.

                We are talking about transferring data, not storing it. For example SPI allows both for LSb-first and MSb-first. In date digit-number-date is like bit-byte-word.

                • linja@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Right, and in data transfer every byte can be placed in an absolute order relative to every other. And the digits within the respective fields are already big-endian (most significant digit first), so making the fields within the whole date little-endian is mixed-endian.

                  I have iterated this several times, so I worry there’s a fundamental miscommunication happening here.

      • Inductor@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        base12 has the advantage of being divisible by 2, 3, 4 and 6, while base10 is only divisible by 2 and 5.

          • bluewing@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            The Dozenal system does have some advantages over base10. Feel free to poke around []https://dozenal.org/drupal/content/brief-introduction-dozenal-counting.html to learn a bit about Donzenal/Duodecimal counting and maths.

            And to bring up a point, why did every nation that adopted the metric system require a law(s) to force people to use it? Complete with penalties if you don’t. If it was such a good and great idea, people would have naturally gravitated to it don’t you think?

        • bluewing@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Ahh, another connoisseur of the Dozenal system! Everyone should add a little dek and el to their life!

        • uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          You listed 2 twice(thrice if counting 6) for base12 and once for base10. Generally, when talking about bases better talk only about prime factors. Base12 has 2 and 3 as prime factors, while base10 has 2 and 5.

      • s_s@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        You don’t need to add or multiply time very often. Division is super important tho, and base60 is better than base10 for that.

      • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Too easy. Plus we put in the 3/5 “compromise” so you can’t expect old white racists to learn proper math

      • bluewing@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        The French did try it back when they were in the process of changing to the metric system in the 1700s. Even THEY quickly determined that, much like the creation of the universe, it was a very bad idea. And it was very quietly dropped. French tried hard to scrub that moment of insanity from the history books. But well, the internet is truly forever in both directions I guess.

        Metric time quickly got out of sync with the periods of light and dark. Mother Nature evidently doesn’t like humans dicking around with the time periods of her celestial movements. (Dozenal for the win!)

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      The 12 hour one is just so wildly dumb and inconsistent.

      Why does it go from 11 AM to 12 PM to 1 PM?

    • letsgo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Why would you demand metric everything and not metric time?

      • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Cause then we’d be thinking we’re monkeys on a spherical rock in a vacuum instead of calibrating clocks to a radioactive element to make sure everyone tunes in to wheel of fortune on time while this oblate spheroid tumbles around

        Also, it’s hard enough getting people to equate Km and C with known quantities, Americans can’t handle base unit shifts like that

        • hellofriend@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Cause then we’d be thinking we’re monkeys on a spherical rock in a vacuum instead of calibrating clocks to a radioactive element to make sure everyone tunes in to wheel of fortune on time while this oblate spheroid tumbles around

          Just a little sodium chloride

    • Jentu@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      If America is going to go through the trouble to convert everything to metric, might as well switch to base 10/decimal time as well lol

    • lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I love the 24 hour clock and living in London, UK I used it all the time. However, I remember one time I bought movie tickets at lunch for 17:30 and my brain thought it was for 7:30pm and I called my friend at the last moment saying: “you have to leave work early if we’re gonna make it!”

  • whoisthedoktor@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    There was a beautiful time back when I was young where we tried to change to metric and schools taught us nothing but. Now I’m ~50 years old and don’t even know how many pints are in a gallon. Or feet in a mile. Always forget whether it’s 12 or 16 that’s inches in a foot / ounce to pound. Always have to look that shit up. Because they didn’t teach us that garbage. Ever.

    Guess what I NEVER have to look up? The measurements that tell you in their fucking prefixes how many X are in Y. What a concept.

    • candybrie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Don’t worry. You likely wouldn’t remember even if you were taught. 5280 feet/mile is just not worth the brain space. Neither is 8 pints/gallon. I don’t think you would convert between the two often enough to make it useful information to just know.

      And I do have to look up those prefixes for the less used ones. It’s exa then peta or peta then exa and what’s bigger than them? What’s smaller than nano? I don’t remember because it rarely comes up. But I’m in tech, so it’s starting to more.

      • linja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I remember 5280 despite being Australian because I saw that stupid mnemonic tweet. I remember the SI prefixes because of xkcd.

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    7 months ago

    Metric has been legally “preferred” in the US since 1975. We just don’t use it.

    Also while I was looking up that year I came across this wild factoid:

    In 1793, Thomas Jefferson requested artifacts from France that could be used to adopt the metric system in the United States, and Joseph Dombey was sent from France with a standard kilogram. Before reaching the United States, Dombey’s ship was blown off course by a storm and captured by pirates, and he died in captivity on Montserrat.

  • Zorque@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    You could always use the metric system, that was always allowed. Most food (I’ve seen) has both imperial and metric measurements. Most digital measuring devices and lots of analog ones will have options for both. Speedometers generally have both.

    Really, the only one stopping you from using the metric system in your daily life is you. Unless of course you’re saying you want other people to use it. Which is a distinctly different proposition.

    • Septian@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’d argue the two greatest barriers for the average, non-STEM individual adopting metric in America is the speed limits being in mph and the temperature being in °F. Both are convertible easily enough, but when you constantly have to do so to engage with critical infrastructure or safety (cooking temps, etc.) It provides a barrier against adoption for anyone without the drive to make a concerted effort to use metric.

      • bitwaba@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Between the two, I think temperature is the harder one. But strangely, it also brings weight and volume back into it: Cookbooks.

        So many recipes are finely tuned balances of measurements that just look plain alien when converted to metric.

      • Kushan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        In the UK we’re mostly using metric with the odd exception (we still love a pint of beer), one of which is that speeds are measured in MPH. It’s not really a big deal, there aren’t many customers between miles and kilometres and anything less than a km is still usually measured in metres.

  • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    You can’t have it because of peer pressure from dead people. You gotta take them seriously, motherfuckers will haunt your ass and say shit like “thirty fathoms, gold dubloons and schooners, twenty nickel shillings”. We have the metric system in our country and the ghosts suck, they don’t even try to come up with sensical nonsense phrases for the sake of the bit, the lazy bastards.

  • Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m a scientist. I’ve used the metric system since grade school. In fact, I convert Imperial measurements to metric to do estimates.

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Engineer here, I just use whatever’s convenient. It’s handy to know both.

      That said, I did confuse a poor coworker of mine this week when I was using bar for tank pressure and psi for the safety reliefs. That’s totally on me though.

  • johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I dunno, it’d probably be better but there’s nothing stopping people from using metric in places where it makes sense. I write most of my recipes in grams because it makes them easier to multiply or divide.

    At the same time, the most common thing people use units for is a point of reference, and it really makes no difference whether your point of reference is metric or traditional units.

        • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          That’s fine right up to when you’re complaining about the temperature to an american.

          But I am an American. To learn Celsius I came up with a quick heuristic to do “accurate enough” conversions for the months between switching off Fahrenheit and getting to the point where I knew Celsius well enough.

          So I can pretty quickly go from Celsius to Fahrenheit for my ignorant compatriots.

          Edit: For anyone downvoting me, if it’s because I called people who don’t know Celsius “ignorant,” please understand I’m using this definition: “lacking knowledge, information, or awareness about a particular thing.”

          Not this one: “lacking knowledge or awareness in general; uneducated or unsophisticated,” nor this one: “discourteous or rude.”

          We are all ignorant about things we don’t know about. No shame in ignorance, it’s the default state of all living beings!

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m a machinist, I don’t get to choose my units. We use standard and try to avoid metric dimensioning like the plague. The difference between .005 inches and .005 millimeters is literally an order of magnitude.