Airbnb is adding cleaning fees to a new ‘total price’ of bookings in search results after people complained listings were misleading::Airbnb’s CEO said that he’s heard guests “loud and clear” that pricing on the platform isn’t transparent and “checkout tasks are a pain.”

  • Indie@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    Airbnb is a bane on our society and massive contributer to the housing shortage.

    This company needs to get sued into oblivion with their shitty practices and non transparent charges.

  • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Honestly AirBnB used to be cool but now it kinda sucks.

    Even though there’s now a ‘total price’ option, booking a basic hotel is still less painful. There’s cleaning fees and a lot of hosts have stupid requirements like you have to do the laundry or take out the trash or whatever. If I’m paying hotel level fees I want hotel level service. Plus every now and then you hear about one of these places having cameras in the unit. Fuck that.

  • loaffy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    AirBnB fucking sucks now. There needs to be a term like “slum lords” for AirBnBs. They outsource so many properties to property managers and the house is disgusting PLUS they charge you the cleaning fee.

    Just stick with hotels.

  • jimmyjoners@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can’t scroll past an air bnb post without stopping in to say fuck air bnb for its role in the housing crisis. It should be banned unless it’s owner occupied.

    • Alperto@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      As many other things on the internet, the original idea was great (renting your couch or a room in your house for tourists to accommodate and feel a local experience, but once it reached the masses, and speculative companies bought properties just to rent them and pay cheap labor to maintain the rooms, it became BS one more time.

      No matter what those whose drive is pure economical touch, they always ruin it.

        • TomTheGeek@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Money doesn’t turn people evil. Humans are inherently greedy. Money is the scalpel that exposes our true self.

          • reliv3@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I really hate when people make this claim that humans are inherently greedy. I usually find that the people who believe in this are greedy people who want to believe that it’s natural. It’s a way for them to feel less guilty about a quality that can be deemed unsavory.

            It doesn’t take much to find evidence that goes against this claim. Buddhist monks who take vows of poverty, teachers who teach to help children despite low salaries, family members who spend money to help other family members, true Christians who follow the footsteps of Christ, and the list can continue.

            In addition, consider this, almost all of animalia on Earth takes only what they need. Lion prides aren’t hunting prey to the brink of extinction. Bees take only what they need to maintain a healthy hive. Historically, most Native American tribes only took from the land what they needed to live.

            No, humans are not inherently greedy… Humans are inherently adaptable. This is something all animalia shares. And currently, our societal systems rewards those who make and hold onto the most money that they can. What this means is most of the “successful” people in our society are likely somewhat greedy. This causes some of us to believe that greed is necessary to survive, but most of us focus on being happy and having enough money to maintain that happiness. Money promises security, and security helps keep people happy; but you don’t need to be a multi-millionaire in order to be secure.

            • TomTheGeek@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              But Capitalism

              Here’s a hint, capitalism isn’t the problem. Capitalism allows us to do what we want, which means we can be greedy. Freedom is a two edged sword. One that I will gladly take cuts from while it enables our way of life. No one else is responsible for your safety but you.

              • TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Capitalism is definitely the problem here. When profit above everything is the goal and how the system operates it’s always going to lead to things like this. Capitalism doesn’t “enable our way of life”, advances in technology allowed that all capitalism does is ensure the majority of those gains are going to the people at the top instead of society as a whole.

          • Catma@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I dont think people are inherently greedy. We are taught from a young age the need for money which in turn makes people greedy. Ie nurture not nature

            If people grew up on small farms with only a bartering system, i dont think people would hoard resources nearly as much.

            It may be i want to see the best in people but i do believe most people would rather help others than not.

            • TomTheGeek@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              We are taught from a young age the need for money

              Bartering isn’t any better than using fiat. Fiat allows economies to function at a level bartering can never approach. To say we ‘need’ money exposes your ignorance.

  • spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pretty sure it has absolutely nothing to do with user complaints and everything to do with talk of regulation.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Yup yup, we hear you loud and clear, everyone, it’s all good bro”

    [Doesn’t turn full price on by default]

    Incoming follow-up, if challenged…

    “So we actually paid an expert consultant to tell us that a percentage of our user population actually wants to be actively deceived whenever they use our service. So by default we will still obscure these non-negotiable fees that you will definitely pay in the final pricing.”

  • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Tell me again why I would ever choose to get a room through AirBnB? Or travel across a city using Uber? Or have my food delivered by GrubHub?

    Everyone wants to claim they have no money, and yet all these services needlessly add cost and complexity to what used to be a far more simple and cheaper purchase just a few years ago. I’ll take a taxi to my hotel room and pick up my own food thankyouverymuch.

        • Hankaaron@yall.theatl.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Where I am they are few and far between, will definitely take longer to arrive (if they arrive - no way to know if they are coming or not) and will be more expensive. They drivers will also almost certain try to long-trip you, hassle you for more tips, etc.

          Uber isn’t perfect but it’s way, way better than a taxi here

        • TWeaK@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Where I am there are taxis you can hail and prebooked. The hail taxis don’t come out here unless someone takes one out from the city, and the prebooked ones can only really be booked well in advanced. However I can summon an uber immediately.

    • KapiteinPoffertje@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      In cities yes. It still is unparalleled for renting small holiday homes in “rural” areas. E.g. Scottish Highlands, French Brittany.

      That is the proper use case, where you would otherwise book an other B&B.

      • Doodoocaca@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Indeed, I’ve used airbnb several times now to rent a vacation home in the French/Belgian/German countryside. For that it’s great. Cheaper than renting a bungalow somewhere and you have more space.

      • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yea, one of the reasons uber is so popular is because it is cheaper and faster in most places. The business model sucks for the drivers, but it is mostly an upgrade to taxi services for people who use it to commute.

        • gornar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It sucks for drivers, which is why it’s cheaper, I guess. That has to change, because that money clearly belongs on the executive, not translated into savings to customers!

    • Bye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      When I used to use it, over 10 years ago, it was great for couch surfing for a six pack and staying in peoples spare rooms for like $20. Did it all over Australia and Europe in college.

      Now I think they’ve positioned themselves as being high-end hotel alternatives, because there’s more margin there. It was never good for that.

      • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Today they’ve positioned themselves as a means for landlords to make a large amount of money from short stay holiday rentals instead of residential rental.

      • ZombieTheZombieCat@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        And yet when I looked at places in Vegas, they were all shittier and more expensive than actual hotels. I really wanted to save money, so I really tried to give it a chance, but nothing that came up was worth it when I could just get an actual hotel. And the more I thought about it, I’m also just not comfortable using AirBnB as a single woman. Maybe other people have felt totally safe and had nothing happen and that’s great. But I know I would never feel one hundred percent certain there’s no cameras, and that whoever’s renting it wouldn’t just walk right in.

        I’ve also seen those AirBnB management companies renting out rooms in the larger LV casinos for the same price, with the same amenities, and with the same resort fees. That one’s a total mystery to me.

        And now they’re advertising AirBnB “rooms” or whatever it’s called where you sleep in a bedroom in the same house as the owner? While the owner is just…there?! That would just be so uncomfortable and awkward to begin with, but it also just kind of seems like a matchmaking app for serial killers.

        • gornar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Airbnb was originally the room concept, it’s was for couch surfing! Now it’s used to jack up housing prices for the profit of the few, naturally!

    • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I get food through doordash because I can’t be arsed to pick up my own food on a lazy weekend. I’m also on the edge of nowhere, so I tip well. (This is a rare treat, not my primary means of feeding myself.)

      Airbnb has never had appeal for me. I like the clear expectations of a standard hotel room.

      • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I rather not have my food messed with by some random delivery person thankyouverymuch

        • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Around here, bags of food for delivery are sealed up tighter than Ft. Knox (figuratively). Tape, staples, plastic bag around the outside tied up in knots you have to cut to get through. Plus, food deliverer germs are no worse than food preparer germs. I have enough innate germaphobe in me that I actively refuse to worry about my food being tampered with in ways I won’t notice. If I did that, I’d never eat any food I didn’t prepare myself, from ingredients that came in their own wrapper (banana, cantaloupe, live mussels).

          • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            No thanks. Between all the extra plastic and waste to keep people from tampering my stuff, to food getting cold and rubbery if left in a container for too long, to extra cost, it’s all a big fat no from me.

  • Melco@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    After 10 years of users begging for it.

    What a customer focused company, a reliable travel partner.

  • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I will never understand how this is a fucking thing. Let alone so fucking much? Don’t want to have to pay to clean up after your guests leave? Then I guess you are in the wrong fucking business assholes.

  • cantevencode@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s great playing a cleaning fee when the host expects you to strip the bed and take it to the laundry, empty the bins and leave the place spotless

    • gornar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Since they’re gonna keep the fee anyway, might as well floss yer ass on the sheets I guess!

  • Dasnap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The amount the owner often asks you to do yourself would make you think they should be paying you the fee.

  • i_am_hungry@meganice.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been using hotels instead of Airbnb for a while now, and it’s most often cheaper or similar price, and better service.

    • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep, it’s nice to be a customer and not be rated and reviewed based on how well you cleaned up after yourself. Also dislike how Airbnb is a different interaction with the host every time. Some hosts are nosey or overbearing. I prefer the hotel front desk and then to be an anonymous customer after that.

    • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Here AirBnB just isn’t really comparable to a hotel.

      In a hotel you get a bed, bathroom, a tiny desk, tv chair, and microwave. When you pay more the room is functionally the same, just maybe in a better location or nicer lobby.

      With short stay accommodation you get an actual dwelling. Even in a tiny studio apartment you have a full kitchen and an actual table.

      Obviously if hotels & short stay were like for like then you would stay in a hotel if that were cheaper - but that’s just not the reality here. Short stay accom is dramatically more comfortable.

    • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I see this on Reddit all the time and I chalked it up to a marketing campaign by hotels because it’s just so wrong, at least where I am.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just checked and I was shocked to see how much any place was for a weekend… but I guess it is a weekend and I was looking at August… so there is that. Idk, I just assumed it wouldn’t cost $380 to rent someone’s RV that is across a street (not even abutting) from a lake for 2 nights…