Goodreads is perhaps the best example of enshittification imo. It’s only good now as a way to track your reading lists.

I tried bookwyrm today and it feels quite polished already, like giving you a guided tour of it’s features. Hopefully it takes off as well similar to mastodon and lemmy.

  • Izzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    wouldn’t it make more sense to make a more generic federated list site that could be used for any category of things you wanted?

    • CloverSi@lemmy.comfysnug.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Books, music, movies and so on all have big differences in how they’re best presented, what sort of information they should have, how social features are best integrated. I don’t really see a monolithic site that tries to do all of that being better than separate federated sites that can cater to their own unique focus.

      • Izzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I don’t mean to make a single website do all of those things. I mean in the sense of making a federated website protocol that allows you to start an instance for whatever kind of thing you want. Maybe it wouldn’t work, but it would save a lot of time on re-inventing the wheel every time you wanted a new type of tracking site.

    • TheInsane42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      There is a list of fediverse apps available, not yet for projects in start up. (Or I haven’t found it yet)

      • NotAPenguin@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I think they’re saying that instead of making a site to track books and site to track music and a site to track movies and a… we could just have one site that’s built to track anything and you just set the category.