• Womble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      That seems a bit of a non-story given that its prefaced on “once the attacker has access to your work email”. Yes once they have that they can do very good spear phishing attacks using copilot, but they could easily do them without copilot too.

  • N3Cr0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    This 3rd party software company fucked up and M$oft get the pressure, so they act like they are responsible.

    Even the customers fucked up by using a vital piece of software where they cannot test the updates before rollout.

    • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      A third party vendor whose entire business model is predicated on the fact that security is such an afterthought at Microsoft that enterprise customers need to resort to this kind of crap for a bare minimum of security.

        • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Never said it didn’t. Doesn’t change the fact that Microsoft is notoriously worse by every metric and because of its position in the market is far more potentially damaging. Almost like if you sell an OS as something that can be trusted to run mission critical applications, you probably shouldn’t phone it in when it comes to securing that OS.

          • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            2 months ago

            🙄👌👍

            Definitely just not easier to use even you don’t want to fuck around in the terminal.

              • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                Contributor to TF and several CNCF projects. You use my code every day. Different tools different jobs twat.

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is also MS’s fault because they never provided a proper API for security products like MacOS, so they end up having to run them all inside the kernel.

      The reason for this omission was to give a competitive advantage to their own security products while also being cheaper.

  • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Didn’t 5h3y just release an update that bricked dual boot installs. Something tells me someone else should be organising this. Someone that actually cares.

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Microsoft didn’t cause the “disaster” though.

        • db2@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          It exists on OSX and Linux too, they just don’t do the thing that took down Windows so they weren’t impacted.

          • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Existing and being necessary are two different things. Linux and MacOS are operating systems. Windows is an ad delivery system that masquerades as an operating system.

            • lud@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              If windows were absolutely perfect with no flaws whatsoever, CrowdStrike wouldn’t be a necessity. I agree with that.

              Unfortunately we live in the real world and no OS is perfect so software like CrowdStrike exists on lots of operating systems.

              Btw, Crowdstrike isn’t necessary but it’s very nice to have for companies. You don’t need real time protection like that on a normal client you use at home.

  • RangerJosie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Don’t they have an easily hacked screenshot collecting bit of Bloat/Spyware they’re desperately trying to get everyone to use?

    • Vince@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Sounds like something they should talk about in some kind of summit about security