• Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      2 months ago

      Has anyone mentioned, just in passing, that if Putin withdrew there would be no motivation for the Ukrainians to even continue fighting. Well, except for revenge.

  • GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Remember when Russia signed that contract to not attack it’s ex colonies if they give up their nukes?

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memorandum

    According to the three memoranda,[6] Russia, the US and the UK confirmed their recognition of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine becoming parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and effectively removing all Soviet nuclear weapons from their soil, and that they agreed to the following:

    Respect the signatory’s independence and sovereignty in the existing borders (in accordance with the principles of the CSCE Final Act).[7]

    Refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of the signatories to the memorandum, and undertake that none of their weapons will ever be used against these countries, except in cases of self-defense or otherwise in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.

    Refrain from economic coercion designed to subordinate to their own interest the exercise by Ukraine, the Republic of Belarus and Kazakhstan of the rights inherent in its sovereignty and thus to secure advantages of any kind.

    Seek immediate Security Council action to provide assistance to the signatory if they “should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used”.

    Not to use nuclear weapons against any non - nuclear-weapon state party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, except in the case of an attack on themselves, their territories or dependent territories, their armed forces, or their allies, by such a state in association or alliance with a nuclear weapon state.[8][9][10]

    Consult with one another if questions arise regarding those commitments.[11][12]

  • eran_morad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    2 months ago

    Blyat showed his hand the moment he invaded a non-nuclear state. Ukraine would be fucking dumb af not to develop nukes.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s funny though, the only countries that don’t get invaded now are the ones with nuclear weapons. 🤷‍♂️

  • Verdorrterpunkt@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    The whole world demonstrated it clearly. If it’s not in a big alliance, it needs nukes or the world will fuck the country over.

    Nice precedent set there by pacivity, or outright aggression. Good job nuclear powers, real nice (/s).

    • misk@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      If the west wants to prevent nuclear proliferation they have to defend a county that gave up nukes willingly for the promise of defense. Shortsightedness of the western powers will lead to more countries learning from Ukraine’s mistake and hurt us worse than whining of a despot could ever do. It’s not like that big alliance doesn’t have nukes either.

      • GeneralInterest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        I feel like the West is just doing the bare minimum to support Ukraine. Enough to be able to say “look we did something” but not too much, because maybe some voters won’t understand the benefits of spending their taxes on Ukraine.

      • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        they have to defend a county that gave up nukes willingly for the promise of defense

        I agree with you, but the problem here lies with the fact that the promise was made by the same fucking country doing the invasion (Russia).

        So no promise was made by the West or NATO in any way to Ukraine. Get your facts straight.

    • Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      “Big alliance” part is also untested. Who knows what would happen if Putin got Ukraine fast and moved onto the Baltics.

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 months ago

    if he hasn’t been able to take ukraine in however many years and is having to borrow half ass troops from NK, then wtf is he actually going to do about it? he’s arrogant for sure, but not dumb enough to use nukes himself

      • GeneralInterest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Ideally no country would have nuclear weapons, but I don’t think Russia’s call for denuclearisation should be taken with any seriousness whatsoever unless they get rid of their own nukes.

  • jabathekek@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 months ago

    Oh cool, so they’ll withdraw from Ukrainian territories so they won’t need to build nukes, right?

    …Right?

  • Tiptopit@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    So maybe they can guarantee that they don’t and won’t have nuclear weapons and Putin leaves them alone?/s

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ukraine gave up the nuclear weapons they retained after the end of the USSR in exchange for a promise from Russia that they wouldn’t get invaded.