• EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    What’s with the wording of this title? “Unhoused people” instead of “Homeless”/“Homeless people”

    • GroundedGator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      I heard a really good explanation of this on NPR. Homeless is a label put on a person, similar to saying a person is a redhead. The implication of saying that someone is homeless is that it defines who they are, that it cannot be easily changed.

      Unhoused is more descriptive of the situation that a person is in. This is a condition that can be changed, it isn’t who the person is.

      As I revisit this and think it through though, it seems like another way of pushing the goal. There are absolutely negative connotations with the word homeless, but the same venom will eventually attach to unhoused as well.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      It’s another one of those whack a mole words people are pushing. Once everyone gives in and we start using unhoused, it will suddenly switch to uninhabited because it’s racists to houses or something!

      It’s annoying as hell, because instead of fixing the issues we’re mastrubating about words and alienating people that we need to fix the issue.