• hydrashok@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    26 days ago

    “My kids don’t want to hang out with me after I dismissed their opinions as a mental disorder and the party I voted for tries to control their bodies! Why must I suffer? I didn’t do anything to them directly! These kids today are so unfaaaair!”

    What a jackass.

    I hope his kids have a great holiday. Good on them for standing up for their beliefs.

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    25 days ago

    Idk who needs to hear this but:

    Your children don’t owe you self assurance, if they chose to cut contact with you fully then that’s their right.

  • Dasus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    25 days ago

    “I let them”

    Dudes showing internally he thinks he controls their votes. That he could’ve not let them had he chosen so.

    So his daughters should be thankful for such a benevolent patriarch. /S

    • Soleos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      He clearly said in context “I let them vote in peace without objection or argument frome me”. Kind of like how I can either let your comment go or choose to respond without claiming to have control over you. The man is still ignorant AF though.

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        Your explanation is accurate, but your undercutting the importance of the statement. If you don’t have the power, then you don’t “let people” do anything.

        Which is to say, he was contemplating being a giant a****** and pressuring them to vote the way he wanted, but he decided to use common sense, to not be a jerk, and now he’s asking for a prize for doing what most of us do all the time everyday.

        This doesn’t make him a horrible human being, but it certainly doesn’t make him a good one. In his mind, special rules apply only to him.

    • x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      25 days ago

      Well it’s kind of semantics. The symbolism behind this is not the hill you’d want to die on. Letting somebody do something can either be allowing it or simply not disallowing it. I hate Trump and his low IQ followers, but that sentence does not imply anything.

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        25 days ago

        can either be allowing it or simply not disallowing it

        Exactly.

        When I go take a shit, did you allow it, or not disallow it? Neither, because you have no agency over me, so it’d be a stupid fucking sentence.

        I’m not saying he thinks he owns his daughters like some 16th century inbred minor noble.

        But connotations and implications can exist even when they weren’t particularly intentional by the writer (or speaker.)

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    26 days ago

    “I openly voted against the interests of my own children and also openly claim they have a mental disorder for their views.”

    Get fucked.

    These people really are clueless. No appreciation at all for how their actions affect others. They get surprised when people stop putting themselves in harms way by simply not being around them.

    Want your family back? Realize that what you think is some free speech populist revolution is just an excuse for a lot of people to be assholes and expect no consequences.

    • refalo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      to be fair, democrats think voting for trump is a mental illness too.

      not on anyone’s side here, just pointing out the hypocrisy

      • in4aPenny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        It’s not that Trumpism is a mental illness, more like you need to have a mental illness to be a Trump supporter.

        • refalo@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          25 days ago

          this is no different than the right calling the left mentally ill.

          both of you think you’re right, and I think the real answer is nobody is right.

          “As a rule, strong feelings about issues do not emerge from deep understanding.”

          • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            25 days ago

            The dictators claims that all of their political opponents are terrorists is not analogous or equally valid to the terrorized political opponents calling the dictator a terrorist. If you can’t comprehend how those two groups are different — the logical separation between the conman who lies about everything and terrorizes his opponents, and every group he chooses to terrorize — then you either have the mental illness, or are most at risk to the propaganda (and future mental illness).

            Pro tip! Only a fascist opposes ANTI-FAscism.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        Hypocrisy is clutching your pearls and virtue signalling “Christian conservative values” while worshipping a “grab-em-by-the-pussy” false-profit who is the closest thing to the antichrist in living memory.

        So yeah, only one of those groups has a literal mental illness, and they are also the hypocrites.

  • WrenFeathers@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    26 days ago

    There’s clearly more to this story. The simple fact that his username is “Conservative” indicates that he is one of those people that make their political ideology a major part of their identity.

    This man is probably an insufferable ass.

    • theangryseal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      Or he’s making it up.

      I made my mother cry because she voted for Trump and I expressed my disapproval. She called my sister, who also voted for Harris, and my sister made her cry a second time.

      We’re all having dinner tomorrow and we won’t bring up politics.

      It’s fucking stupid to turn your back on your family over politics.

      I think my mom made a stupid decision. Oh well. She thinks I made a stupid decision.

      If your politics define you so much that you abandon your people or you’re not disciplined enough to keep your mouth shut at family events where you’ll convince no one, that’s on you.

      They bring it up and end up having a bad day, that’s on them. We simply agree to avoid politics and religion. It’s not that hard.

      Edit: We’re doomed. We really are.

      • Womdat10@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        26 days ago

        Unfortunately, my continued existence is labeled as “politics” so no, someone who voted against my rights to exist is not my family anymore.

        • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          26 days ago

          The genders: male and political. The colours: white and political. The sexualities: straight and political.

          Yet somehow the most common politician is straight white male.

      • Tyfud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        26 days ago

        You know what we call Germans who disagreed with Hitler on some issues and yet still supported him?

        Nazis.

        Nobody cares, or will ever remember anything other than that.

        • 4lan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          25 days ago

          I guarantee the same thing was happening back then, people cutting off their family members because they supported a fascist dictatorship

      • Leg@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        26 days ago

        It’s fucking stupid to turn your back on your family over politics

        It’s really not. Politics determine your opinions and intentions regarding human rights and its violations. If my dad votes for Robodolf Mechahitler, he’s not my dad anymore. Someone voting for Trump would likely betray their own daughter when Gilead rises. If they wouldn’t, their vote is a contradiction to their character. I wouldn’t take something like this lightly.

      • 4lan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        25 days ago

        You aren’t the voice of reason you think you are.

        I guarantee the same exact shit was happening in the 1930s. People being disgusted that their family members would side with fascism and turn on mentally ill, Jewish, and gays.

        Would you say the same thing about Germans turning on their family? Both leaders fought for turning their country into a fascist dictatorship best strips liberties from certain people only

      • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        26 days ago

        It’s absolutely not stupid to turn your back on family because of politics.

        It’s not a sports team, it’s conscious decisions that affect the law and how we are governed.

      • licheas@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        It’s fucking stupid to turn your back on your family over politics.

        I think my mom made a stupid decision. Oh well. She thinks I made a stupid decision.

        If your politics define you so much that you abandon your people or you’re not disciplined enough to keep your mouth shut at family events where you’ll convince no one, that’s on you.

        Yes. It is fucking stupid.

        But you know what’s worse? Supporting a political party over your daughters, who are facing the very real possibility they will have to die simply because of a miscarriage, or no longer having the right to vote. That they will be forced to carry the baby of their rapist. that their daughters may no be entitled to an education- even the shitty ones now provided- the same way they were.

        Facing those threats… because you voted for that political party.

        They’re not staying away, or “turning their back” on family because of politics. They’re doing so because his politics objectively suck and absolutely will bring harm to them and millions like them. (that is. women. Not to mention racial minorities, immigrants, anyone whose different from the white, cisgendered, conservative male arch type.)

        • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          26 days ago

          It’s so interesting to see the complete disconnection on here with everyone else’s life.

          his politics objectively suck and absolutely will bring harm to them and millions like them. (that is. women. Not to mention racial minorities, immigrants, anyone whose different from the white, cisgendered, conservative male arch type.)

          will, will bring harm. Not talking about past harm, not even mentioning current harm. Just FUTURE harm. All of the middle class people on here are just fucking hilarious with their world views. If you’re wondering why most of the population sits out of voting, well you’re never going to see it. Cue the average ivory tower response,

          • Seleni@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            25 days ago

            Sure I’m going to go over a waterfall as soon as I go around that bend in the river up there, but why should I get my canoe out of the water now? I mean, everyone knows if a problem is in the future it doesn’t really exist!

            FYI, dude, it’s not in the future. Women are dying from miscarriages now. Racially-motivated assaults are on the rise now. Nazis are marching through the streets now. Orange Hitler and his Project 2025 cabinet wants to just bring this bullshit nationwide, and they will do so.

            • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 days ago

              I’m assuming everyone was confusing my statement as some type of pro-trump comment or dismissal of the election results?

              I was literally talking about everything you just stated. Everyone is worried about what the Trump presidency is bringing when we are already there in terms of disparaging and effecting the population with our government’s actions. Everyone’s holding their breaths and speculating on what the next presidency will bring while completely ignoring all the crisis’s that are on-going currently.

              I’m also flabbergasted that everyone is afraid of what the trump presidency will bring while those same problems have happened for generations and like they don’t currently exist. I suppose people just want to be outraged and I’m not helping with pointing out he’s just making a horrible system become that much worse. These problems existed before Trump for most of the populace.

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        Yes it is that hard. If you consider the real effects that politics has on people’s lives, the direct negative consequences of laws and policies that make their lives worse, and then you ask us to ignore those and stop talking about them, maybe we’ll be able to do it if we are not the direct victims. But as soon as you are the direct victim, of course you’re going to speak out on it.

        Here’s a very simple example. One of my relatives uses a wheelchair or a walker, and they have a vehicle with handicap tags that they use to get around. The problem is, one problem is, that many polling places don’t have the legally required handicap parking available. So my relative has extreme difficulty voting. That’s a political problem, a political issue, that disenfranchises my relative. Should they be able to discuss it with the family? I sure hope so. But is it politically charged? Of course it is.

        What you’re asking, what you’re expecting, is that every single victim has to shut the f****** about the bad s*** they’re dealing with, just because it’s connected to the government.

        And look, I picked one of the mildest examples you could possibly think of. After all, my relative might be able to vote absentee, depending on the rules in their state. But there are so many more examples that are absolutely tragic, that involve lives being totally ruined. And you think those should be off limits.

      • Nelots@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        It’s fucking stupid to turn your back on your family over politics.

        Right? Which is why the person in the original post shouldn’t have voted for the guy that wants to take away the rights of his daughters. By voting for Trump, he chose politics over family, not his daughters.

      • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        Drag wishes there were fewer people in the world willing to set aside politics for family. People like that are destroying the world.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    26 days ago

    “I voted for the idea that women aren’t people, now the women in my life don’t like me.”

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    Slightly off topic:

    When my parents divorced, I was bummed out that I had to attend two thanksgiving dinners. The second was not turkey. We charred hot dogs over an open fire (lived in the midwest at the time) and made smores. It was pretty great.

    This had nothing to do with the election. It’s just a nice memory.

  • smokebuddy [he/him]@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    26 days ago

    It might be because this guy voted for trump, and that would be justifiable, but it’s more likely that it’s because they have made MAGA their entire personality. Their twitter feed is just a non stop bullshit feed filled with retweets from the usual suspects, there’s no self taken photos, no fun shitposts, nothing about hobbies or events they go to… just transphobia, bullshit and even praise towards Matt Gaetz ffs. Who would want to spend a dinner with someone like that.

    • psivchaz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      I have a family member that doesn’t get this (thankfully just the one). It’s not that he voted for Trump, it’s all the shit he says. The casual “haha jk” racism when I introduced him to a Hispanic friend of mine. The fact that he will loudly talk about some things specifically to upset or annoy people. The fact that he thinks politics is a team sport and Trump’s win is a personal victory for him that somehow means he “beat” the rest of us.

      • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        “It’s not because you voted for Trump. It’s because you’re the kind of person who would vote for Trump.”

    • OpenStars@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      It works on the other side too - e.g. “I’m vegan btw, and voting to restrict access to your ability to eat meat”.

      The difference seems to be that there was no incentive for Putin to set vegans vs. meat eaters against one another, while he very much is getting a ton out of having set conservatives against liberals. Whatever way we choose to fight one another, he wins.

      • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        26 days ago

        It works on the other side too - e.g. “I’m vegan btw, and voting to restrict access to your ability to eat meat”.

        Who’s doing this?

        The difference seems to be that there was no incentive for Putin to set vegans vs. meat eaters against one another,

        Oh, you sweet summer child.

      • protist@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        26 days ago

        Uh…who’s voting to restrict access to meat again? What rights are “the other side” trying to restrict?

  • islands@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    “Now I have been informed that all three children are boycotting thanksgiving”.

    Hmm, maybe it has something to do with shit talking them on twitter. Maybe, and this is just a guess, the family gatherings are not politics free zones but full of conspiracies and drama and more shit talking. Just a guess. But none of this is his fault, it’s those damn brainwashed libruls who are spoiling his fun. Now how is he going to do his trump victory lap if his daughters stay away?

    • veroxii@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      Pretty sure they’re not boycotting thanksgiving and just boycotting him. They’ll probably have the best thanksgiving together in years.

  • BluesF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    Ah the classic:

    “Your behaviour has harmed me, so I do not wish to see you anymore”

    “No, wrong, it is YOUR behaviour in saying this that has harmed ME”

  • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    Conservatives never learn anything. It’s part of why they’re conservative in the first place. They don’t grow, expand their minds, or learn from life. They hit a point where they harden and ruin relationships.

    • Letsdothis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      26 days ago

      Many, many who vote conservative, used to be liberal. Haven’t you learned that most people turn conservatives as they get older? After growth, and learning more about life and politics, people tend to turn conservative…

      The writing on the wall is plain and simple.

      Through experience, people can perceive what politics actually effect their life/family/bottom dollar. The 40yo dumbass has seen president’s come and go. The 20yo dumbass might not even have voted for a president yet. But which dumbass probably has a better formed opinion?

      • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        26 days ago

        It could be “learning more about life and politics” or it could be “becoming senile and having a steady diet of FOX News, Facebook, and YouTube”. Since higher levels of education are correlated with leftist politics, I’m betting on the second one.

      • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        26 days ago

        I’ve heard this multiple times and have very rarely seen it apply. Usually if they’re conservative in their later years, they always were. It just wasn’t as prevalent or talked about. I’ve been a lefty since I was a kid and have not deviated at all.

        It’s like people that once supported Bernie now voting for Trump (they’re a strange anomaly but they exist). They were never actually liberal. They either voted entirely on vibes and feels, or they got swept up in the wave of others around them. Then eventually their true self surfaces.

        • TassieTosser@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          People grow more conservative when they have something to conserve. Also because they’re wanker and weren’t raised right.

      • HessiaNerd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        26 days ago

        I gotta say, I’m becoming more lefty as I age. I grew up with an emphasis on personal responsibility, self reliance etc. Those principles still ring true with me. But I have seen them twisted by conservatives to be used against individuals in the interests of the 1%, the corporations. Trump doesn’t even pretend to play by the same rules. He has literally said “I take no responsibility at all” while as the president for things he was in control of. That’s not a leader, it’s a ruler.

      • Bremmy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        No, that’s just one of those sayings that goes around. It’s the assumption that people make more money as they age thus causing them to be more conservative. Maybe this was true in the 80s

      • S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        I used to be more leaft leaning when young yes. Now I turned 40… I’m feeling anarchist I tell ya… Burn everything stop oppressing no one should have power.

        • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          26 days ago

          100% of the conservatives I’ve known in my life were this, and the libertarians were the same. They have a narrow, self-centered view of everything, and think that everyone has the same exact opportunities they have. If someone isn’t as successful as they are, instead of acknowledging that everyone has a unique set of barriers and experiences, they dismissively write it off as them being lazy.

      • SleafordMod@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        I don’t think age makes people conservative, I think power makes people conservative. If you accumulate wealth and power then you may become conservative in order to protect your wealth from taxes.

        Just as others in this thread have said, it’s the “fuck you, I got mine” attitude.

      • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        In my experience, the loudest conservatives I’ve met have all fallen into 2 categories:

        Explicitly “fuck you I got mine” I can at least appreciate the honesty with these ones.

        And “I haven’t read a book since 12th grade, and now I struggle to read at a 2nd grade level.” And that’s just performing the act of reading. Actual comprehension and critical thinking are completely beyond them.

        The religious types are part of the equation too, but my area isn’t particularly religious, so I don’t often come across those assholes.

      • Otakulad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        I am 44 and went from conservative to liberal. My parents always told me I would switch as I got older and that was wrong. What I learned was conservatives want three things: money, controlling people, and being allowed to say the quiet part out loud.

        What amazes me is conservatives are “Christian” yet don’t want to provide health care to people. I don’t remember Jesus in the bible healing people then asking for payment later.

        • Letsdothis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          25 days ago

          Everyone is dynamic and unique, and no one’s experience is the same as another’s. Of course. I speak in generalities. Personally, I grew up identifying as conservative, then around 23, as my political opinions changed, I considered myself a liberal. That lasted about a dozen years, but now, again, I consider i probably fall more into the conservative camp.

  • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    “Liberalism is a mental disorder” These people are very telling how they treat people who they think legitimately have mental illness.

    • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      26 days ago

      Conservatives 🤝 Liberals
      “The political positions I dislike are caused by mental illness”

      Socialists: "Hey guys maybe we could try not denigrating mental disorders? Maybe we could try building a left wing that welcomes and accepts the neurodivergent and marginalised?

      Liberals: “Fuck you, we’ll never accept psychopaths like Trump!”

      Socialists: “I never agreed with you that Trump is a psychopath. We don’t have to accept Trump in order to treat ASPD folks with dignity!”

      Liberals: “You’re disgusting, enabling abusers like that. If we treat psychopaths with basic dignity, they’ll only use it to abuse us!”

      • Shizrak@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        Words like psychopath have a common usage for people not in psychology/psychiatry. I’m sorry that we’re not meeting the clinical definition that you want, but I don’t think ranting about it all over Lemmy is going to help anything.

        When the average nonspecialist individual thinks “psychopath” they think of someone like Hannibal Lecter, who is dangerous and must be locked up to prevent them harming others, and that’s not going to change from a short form text post. It would take a semester of psychology.

          • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            25 days ago

            That’s a very vague statement. You didn’t specify which type of empathy. For example, cognitive empathy is the ability to intuit what other people are thinking. Autistic people tend to have less cognitive empathy, which is related to the poor social skills. It’s hard to participate in social situations when you have a clinically significant inability to read minds. Drag doesn’t think you want to treat autistic people with suspicion, so why don’t you work on clarifying your statement to an appropriate level of specificity?

                • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  25 days ago

                  Actually, flies love vinegar. It smells like rotting flesh, which is a great place to go lay eggs.

                  This unintuitive fact matches the truth that being rude to people is an important part of the process of personal growth. Getting people to change takes a carrot AND a stick. When they do change, they’ll remember the carrot more easily. But the stick is important too. You can see this politically with the fact that the government likes to praise MLK for his nonviolent methods, but Malcolm X is the one who got Reagan to pass gun control laws in California. MLK’s movement was threatening because the politicians knew that if they didn’t work with the nonviolent protesters, those protesters would join movements like the Black Panthers. Likewise, rude leftists encourage people to be more open to listening to the polite leftists in their lives. The rude ones raise the stakes.