• deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    28 days ago

    Guy whose cars run into stopped fire trucks thinks he’s an expert on computer vision.

  • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    28 days ago

    For those doing the maths at home:

    An F35 who obligingly flies top-towards-you (not exactly something you can do, but hey, maybe they’re turning) is all of 10m tall.

    An AIM-120C can very comfortably hit a target at 100km.

    At that range, the F-35 takes up 26 arcseconds, or 0.007 degrees. That’s roughly about the size of this period, at a distance of 3 meters away.

    [ . ]

    Good luck spotting that in a sky of roughly the same colour, full of other objects.

    • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      You can place cameras anywhere, they don’t need to be right next to what is being targeted. Nearer ranges will allow AI to misidentify at much higher rates than max standoff ranges of an AIM-120C.

  • don@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    Dude’s brain is shit design and fucking sucks, actually

  • billwashere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    Jesus christ … this dude is a fucking moron… if it WAS easy defense companies would be doing it already… and guess what, they aren’t. Between this dickhead and Captain Brainworm the next four years are gonna SUUUUUUCCCCCCKKKKKKK!!!

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    In the long term maybe he has a point. In the short term the other guys are often using a radar built in 1985 and displaying to a ray tube.

    • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      But also, how far can low light sensitive cameras see into the sky? Maybe a couple miles with some sort of telescopic optics? The F35 can attack from beyond visual range using its 100 mile range radar system.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    Just use multiple nuclear power plants to power an AI that constantly scans the sky.

    Are we sure he’s not an NCD poster?

    Edit to add - Musk unlocked the achievement, personal enemy of the DoD and entire defense industry. I’m getting popcorn for this.

  • ddplf@szmer.info
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    MUH AY-EI

    Did he replace his brain with AI already? Because it sure fucking looks like it.

  • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    Looks like being rich and surrounding yourself with yes-people is the #1 cause of sitting confidently at the top of the Dunning-Krueger curve.

  • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    If a fighter jet is within visual range of a camera, it’s already too late. And that’s if there aren’t any clouds.

  • riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    His fucking obsession with computer vision. He’s so convinced he’s right he forgot that clouds exist… and his cars plow straight into obstacles.