From what I can gather this conflict as been going on a long time and the Hamas group has existed for a while too. Why are all the news cycles suddenly focusing on this the past few weeks?

  • magnetosphere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m going to go out on a limb here and suggest that the thousands of violent deaths may have something to do with it.

    • redballooon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Have you heard about Yemen recently?

      No? Then it must be quiet there. No deaths at all.

      • magnetosphere@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        A cynical news producer would say “Yemen? Who cares? Muslims killing other Muslims is about as interesting as gang members killing other gang members. Give me Muslims and Jews killing each other, though, and we’re talking RATINGS, baby!”

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Something like 10,000 civilians dead in the period of a month. Tends to draw the attention

    • sbv@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      OP has a point. There are other conflicts that have high body counts that don’t drive front page stories. Yemen. The stuff going on in Myanmar. Uyghurs. Even the migrant crisis in the Mediterranean.

      You’re right that this is a significant conflict, but our news industry doesn’t assign column inches to body count.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Not the volume of deaths, but the continuousness of deaths.

        Everyday another ~300 people die on average.

        Not to mention media availability, because it’s basically a prison having rockets thrown at it, media can get really good information. They’re not really in a war zone. It’s a one-sided killing field more or less. So great reporting conditions great visuals. Conflicts really concentrated. Just put the cameras right there. You’ll capture most of it.

        If it bleeds it leads.

    • fatbeer@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s that combined with the likelihood for this to turn into WWIII due to the complex web of nation alliances involved in this conflict. Also, many major religions believe the end of the world is tied to this situation.

  • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Not to underplay the severity of the thousands and thousands of deaths, but it’s because christians are obsessed with Israel somehow being a keystone to their end of the world cult.

  • vsg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Israel is one of the US’s biggest allies, calling the attention of the American media, and the world often talks about what the US is talking about. Didn’t Zelenskyy talk about the Israel-Hamas conflict taking attention off Ukraine?

  • visnae@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Probably because this conflict is good for Russia to get the west focusing on something else. I bet they are tunneling money/weapons to Hamas, and probably using their troll army to keep it relevant.

    Other big conflicts and humanitarian catastrophes are not covered by the media strangely.

    Fuck war, fuck authoritarian and totalitarian regimes, fuck people wanting to hurt other people.

  • NAXLAB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Recently, Hamas carried out their largest and most brutal attack on Israel, killing many innocent people and generating international shock

    Israel is now responding by invading Gaza: a dense, poor city with about 2 million people in it to try to wipe out Hamas.

    There is now worldwide outrage at Israel’s response, which is disproportionately deadly due to their advanced military and billions of foreign aid. People are protesting Israel as an apartheid state and claiming that they are now pursuing genocidal goals.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s been simmering on the stove for a while but someone must have put the lid on the pot or something because it boiled out all over the place and burnt grandma

  • sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s an easy story, there are clear sides, and there are vocal demographics in the West that really care about it.

    So it drives clicks. Local Palestinian, Jewish, and related groups are saying stuff that makes for easy interviews. The “other side” is easy to find, so creating multi-source stories is a breeze. For journalists with tight daily deadlines, it’s a gift.

    Even better, politicians are courting those groups, so they’re saying stuff that, again, is easy to report on. And it’s local news!

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The sides are clearly defined. Which, if any is the good side, not so much. However people have strong opinions about one or the other so there’s lots of opportunity for arguments

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The right side, and the wrong side,. Plus you can interview people who argue about right versus wrong. It’s a lot of content that can be farmed

        • TherouxSonfeir@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          In your opinion, Which sides are which sides? I don’t need an essay, just a definition :)

            • TherouxSonfeir@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Which was the point I was getting to with the original commenter. But thanks for… ya know… jumping in.

              • otp@sh.itjust.works
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Having “clear sides” doesn’t mean there’s a clear “right side” and “wrong side”, imo.

                • TherouxSonfeir@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The sides aren’t very clear when you start looking closer. And they’re both the wrong side of you think about it. The best side is the “wow that’s a shit show I’m glad I’m not involved with” side.

  • SirToxicAvenger@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    the media requires people to pay attention to it or they cant sell ad placement. bad news sells better than good news does.

    the war in Ukraine is basically at a standstill, no one is going to watch it. media needs a new focus and Israel vs Iranian funded hamas terrorists is the next big thing. in a few months it’ll be something else - it’s just the focus of the “now”.

  • CaptObvious@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Israel’s genocidal revenge campaign is finally on full display with no legitimate distractions in the news cycle. Even in the US, despite the Israeli government’s efforts to influence ours, there’s public pushback that can’t be ignored.

    Also, if anything happening on the planet right now is going to ignite World War III, this is it.

    • AnarchoDakosaurus@toast.ooo
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      For years many in Syria have said that WW3 has already begun and is being fought in the middle east. You could very well argue this is the opening stage of World War 3. We’re only one misclick, or one civilian airliner being shot down away from even greater catastrophe.

  • TherouxSonfeir@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I posted this question too and got called a racist. I was just curious where all the Ukraine stuff went. Sounds like a planned distraction to me. And since Hamas announced it loves Russia…