From what I can gather this conflict as been going on a long time and the Hamas group has existed for a while too. Why are all the news cycles suddenly focusing on this the past few weeks?

  • sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s an easy story, there are clear sides, and there are vocal demographics in the West that really care about it.

    So it drives clicks. Local Palestinian, Jewish, and related groups are saying stuff that makes for easy interviews. The “other side” is easy to find, so creating multi-source stories is a breeze. For journalists with tight daily deadlines, it’s a gift.

    Even better, politicians are courting those groups, so they’re saying stuff that, again, is easy to report on. And it’s local news!

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The sides are clearly defined. Which, if any is the good side, not so much. However people have strong opinions about one or the other so there’s lots of opportunity for arguments

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The right side, and the wrong side,. Plus you can interview people who argue about right versus wrong. It’s a lot of content that can be farmed

        • TherouxSonfeir@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          In your opinion, Which sides are which sides? I don’t need an essay, just a definition :)

            • TherouxSonfeir@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Which was the point I was getting to with the original commenter. But thanks for… ya know… jumping in.

              • otp@sh.itjust.works
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Having “clear sides” doesn’t mean there’s a clear “right side” and “wrong side”, imo.

                • TherouxSonfeir@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The sides aren’t very clear when you start looking closer. And they’re both the wrong side of you think about it. The best side is the “wow that’s a shit show I’m glad I’m not involved with” side.

                  • otp@sh.itjust.works
                    cake
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I feel the same way when I see a game of American football, but I can still see that there are two sides.

                    I don’t need to take a side to see that there are two distinct sides. Even if I disagree with aspects of both sides.